A case brought by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office to vindicate dog owners’ rights to have their pets notwithstanding an apartment complex’s “no-pets” rule beat back a summary judgment motion last week.
Southern District Judge Edgardo Ramos (See Profile) denied a motion by the defendant apartment complex in U.S. v. East River Housing Corp., 13 Civ. 8650, to dismiss the claims of one of the three tenants on whose behalf the U.S. is suing, on grounds of claim preclusion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
