Court of Appeals Considers Challenge to Storm Water Discharge Permits
In her State Environmental Regulation column, Charlotte A. Biblow writes: An important environmental regulatory case has been winding its way through the New York court system for several years, and now the Court of Appeals finally will decide whether the federal Clean Water Act was violated when a general permit governing discharges from municipal separate storm sewer systems was approved by the state.
March 25, 2015 at 10:34 PM
11 minute read
An important environmental regulatory case has been winding its way through the New York court system for several years. Now, after a January 2012 decision by the Supreme Court, Westchester County,1 an initial ruling on appeal in November 2013 by the Appellate Division, Second Department,2 and a second decision by the Second Department, issued in September 2014, in which it recalled and vacated its November 2013 ruling,3 the dispute finally reached the New York Court of Appeals. Oral argument was set to be held March 24, 2015, before the Court of Appeals.
The issue before the court is of great practical concern to small municipalities throughout New York. The court will decide whether the federal Clean Water Act (CWA)4 was violated when a general permit governing discharges from municipal separate storm sewer systems (known as MS4s) was approved by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) under the New York State Environmental Conservation Law (NYECL).
The Westchester Supreme Court ruled, in essence, that the general permit failed to ensure that small municipalities reduced their pollutant discharges to the “maximum extent practicable,” as required by the CWA. The Appellate Division reversed, finding that the DEC's general permit for MS4s did not violate the CWA.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLack of Agreement on 'Implicit' Settlement Term Insufficient to Preclude Enforcement
7 minute read'Nothing Routine' About Eric Adams Bribery, Prosecutors Tell Judge in Defending Charge
NY Lateral Partner Moves Spike, Especially in PE and Funds Practices
NYC Judge Holds Immigration Restriction Group in Contempt for Inadequate Response to AG Subpoena
Trending Stories
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250