Trade Secret Theft and the Rise of the Private Right of Action
Daniel A. Schnapp, a partner with Fox Rothschild, writes: Individuals and organizations must immediately prepare protective measures to either avoid or ameliorate the inevitable rise of the private right of action in theft of trade secret cases.
April 05, 2015 at 09:06 PM
14 minute read
Theft of trade secrets is likely the most pressing threat to the security of sensitive information maintained by U.S. companies. As Attorney General Eric Holder stated in 2013, ”[t]here are only two categories of companies affected by trade secret theft: those that know they've been compromised—and those that don't know it yet.”1
Further, the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive has estimated losses from economic espionage to be in the tens or even hundreds of billions of dollars annually to the American economy.2
Government's Efforts
Under the Obama administration, the U.S. government has grown increasingly active in determining methods to combat and address the loss of valuable trade secrets. In 2010, the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Counterintelligence Division created the Economic Espionage Unit, a specialized unit focused solely on prosecuting cases under the Economic Espionage Act (the Act). The Act is the leading weapon for prosecutors seeking to bring a criminal suit against potential criminal defendants.3 The Economic Espionage Unit works with private sector partners to investigate and prosecute trade secret theft under the Act.4
The FBI reports that, from 2009 to the end of 2013, the number of economic espionage and theft of trade secrets cases overseen by the Economic Espionage Unit increased by more than 60 percent.5 Further, the FBI reports that economic espionage and theft of trade secrets represent the largest growth area among the traditional espionage cases overseen by the Counterintelligence Division's Counterespionage Section.6
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTesting The Limits of “I Agree”: Court of Appeals Examines Clickwrap Arbitration Agreements
13 minute readChange on the Horizon?: 2025 Begins With Numerous Patent Bills Pending
8 minute readIP at the Frontier of AI: Navigating the New Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Divided Eighth Circuit Sides With GE's Timely Removal of Indemnification Action to Federal Court
- 2Former U.S. Dept. of Education Attorney Suspended for Failure to Complete CLE Credits
- 3ArentFox Schiff Adds Global Complex Litigation Partner in Los Angeles
- 4Bittensor Hackers, Accused of Stealing Over $28 Million, Face Federal Lawsuit
- 5In Novel Oil and Gas Feud, 5th Circuit Gives Choice of Arbitration Venue
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250