Patent Assertion Entities—Market Participants or Trolls?
In their Antitrust Trade and Practice column, Shepard Goldfein and James Keyte write that while the potential anticompetitive effects of Patent Assertion Entities in broad terms may not be discernable until an FTC study is released at the end of this year, there is a growing body of individual actions addressing the viability of antitrust principles to restrict the power of these entities.
April 13, 2015 at 10:00 PM
11 minute read
On March 17, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission approved a final order barring a Patent Assertion Entity (PAE) from using deceptive tactics when asserting patent rights.1 While this marks the first time that the FTC has used its consumer protection authority against a PAE, the FTC has long sought to better understand PAEs—in fact, a two-year-long study on the PAE industry is slated to be completed by the end of this year.
PAEs, also referred to by many as “patent trolls,” are firms that aggregate patents but do not create products based on those patents. Instead, the PAE business model involves collecting license fees and pursuing patent infringement actions against alleged infringers in order to generate revenue. For some, PAEs are an efficient way in which certain non-practicing entities (NPEs)—universities, smaller innovators and the like—can exploit and protect legitimate patent rights.2 Others maintain that PAEs are intellectual-property extortionists that, through sham litigation, can stunt innovation and economic growth, which is contrary to the purposes of both U.S. antitrust and patent laws.
In addition to the FTC, Congress and the judiciary have responded to the growing presence of PAEs, both through lawmaking and, in some instances, recognizing antitrust claims filed against some PAEs that attempt to assert patents. While the potential anticompetitive effects of PAEs in broad terms may not be discernable until the FTC's study is released at the end of this year, there is a growing body of individual actions addressing the viability of antitrust principles to restrict the power of these entities.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250