Significant Changes to New York Brownfield Cleanup Program
In her State Environmental Regulation column, Charlotte A. Biblow writes that with the adoption of this year's budget on April 1, the BCP has been extended and given renewed life. This extension, however, also includes new rules affecting deadlines, changing many key definitions, adding hurdles for New York City properties, and more.
May 27, 2015 at 04:14 PM
11 minute read
A little more than one year ago, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo proposed a state budget that included significant changes to New York's Brownfield Cleanup Program (BCP).1 Those proposed changes did not become law. In June 2014, the New York Legislature passed a bill to extend the BCP beyond its sunset date of Dec. 31, 2015. That, too, did not become law, as late last year, the governor unexpectedly vetoed that bill, claiming it was a budget buster.2 At that point, the future of the BCP was uncertain. Equally uncertain was the fate of properties already in the BCP that were unlikely to complete the required remediation before the sunset date.
Now, with the adoption of this year's budget on April 1, the BCP has been extended and given renewed life. This extension, however, also includes new rules. After briefly discussing the background of the BCP, this column will highlight the major changes to the program and their practical impact on New York's brownfield sites, property owners, and developers.
Background
In 2003, the Legislature enacted the Brownfield Cleanup Program Act in an effort to encourage the private sector to voluntarily remediate brownfields, defined as real property that otherwise would not be developed or used because of the presence or potential presence of hazardous waste or petroleum.3 The 2003 law provided generous tax credits to an entity that entered into a brownfield site cleanup agreement with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC).
The 2003 law provided for a brownfield redevelopment tax credit, consisting of three separate components: (i) the site preparation credit component; (ii) the tangible property credit component; and (iii) the on-site groundwater remediation credit component. The 2003 law also provided for two other brownfield redevelopment tax credits: (i) a real property tax credit; and (ii) an environmental remediation insurance credit based on premiums paid for environmental insurance.4
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLack of Agreement on 'Implicit' Settlement Term Insufficient to Preclude Enforcement
7 minute read'Nothing Routine' About Eric Adams Bribery, Prosecutors Tell Judge in Defending Charge
NY Lateral Partner Moves Spike, Especially in PE and Funds Practices
NYC Judge Holds Immigration Restriction Group in Contempt for Inadequate Response to AG Subpoena
Trending Stories
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250