Will Talent Agency Defense Overcome Idea Theft Claim?
In their Entertainment Law column, Michael I. Rudell and Neil J. Rosini write that when major talent agencies appear in the fact patterns of idea theft and copyright infringement claims, it's usually to establish how the plaintiff's property got into the hands of an agency client, such as the producer or writer of the infringing production. But in a current case, an elite agency was also named as a defendant, accused of breaching an implied-in-fact contract with a screenplay writer, as well as contributory copyright infringement.
June 11, 2015 at 04:20 PM
10 minute read
An elite group of large talent agencies have earned reputations as gatekeepers to success in the film and television industries. Non-client writers and producers attempt to share in that success by becoming agency clients or by having their ideas, presentations and screenplays accepted by the agencies for their existing clients. For example, an agency might receive an idea or draft screenplay from a non-client writer, bring it to a client's attention, and then negotiate the deal for that client to acquire rights. The agencies' practice of “packaging” a combination of services by writers, directors, actors, and producers for a single film or television project, when offering that project to a studio or network, is prevalent and has enhanced their gatekeeping role.
When major talent agencies appear in the fact patterns of idea theft and copyright infringement claims, it's usually to establish how the plaintiff's property got into the hands of an agency client, such as the producer or writer of the infringing production. But in Jordan-Benel v. Universal City Studios,1 United Talent Agency (UTA), which is one of the elite, was named not only as a conduit but also as a defendant, accused of breaching an implied-in-fact contract with the plaintiff writer, as well as contributory copyright infringement of the plaintiff's screenplay, which UTA had rejected.
The writer-director of the allegedly infringing film, James DeMonaco and Why Not Productions (WNP), both UTA clients, together with three other production companies and Universal Studios (collectively, the “production defendants”), also were accused of breaching that implied-in-fact contract as well as direct copyright infringement.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250