Prosecuting Individuals for Corporate Misconduct
In their White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: Move over Holder, Thompson, McNulty, and Filip and make room for Yates. Taking its place in the parade of guidelines issued by top DOJ leadership on the topic of prosecuting business organizations comes "Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing," setting forth six steps to be taken in the investigation of corporate misconduct in order to "fully leverage [the department's] resources to identify culpable individuals...in corporate cases."
October 05, 2015 at 03:24 PM
12 minute read
Move over Holder, Thompson, McNulty, and Filip and make room for Yates. Taking its place in the parade of guidelines issued by top Department of Justice leadership on the topic of prosecuting business organizations comes a new entry from Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates. On Sept. 9, 2015, Yates issued a memorandum titled “Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing” (the Yates Memorandum), setting forth six steps to be taken in the investigation of corporate misconduct in order to “fully leverage [the department's] resources to identify culpable individuals…in corporate cases.”1 With a degree of fanfare, the new regime at the Justice Department has announced that it intends to target individual employees for corporate wrongdoing rather than simply the companies that employ them.
To those who practice in this area, that goal is nothing new. Indeed, experience has shown that the guidance memoranda issued by Justice Department leaders have varying import—some contain specific policy directives that mark a shift in the way the department does business, while others serve more as a public relations tool to inform observers about the department's attitudes and priorities.
The Yates Memorandum appears to fall more into the latter category, as an effort by new Justice Department top leadership to respond to public criticism regarding the lack of prosecutions against individuals in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and in some notable later scandals. Nevertheless, in an organization as large as the Justice Department, the message and attitude from the top do matter, and can be expected to influence line prosecutors and their supervisors. Further, though time will tell, by at least one of the guidelines in her memorandum, Yates appears to have taken another step down the path in deputizing corporate employers to help the Justice Department police their own personnel.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5'You Are Not Alone': 120 Sex Assault Victims Plan to Sue Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250