Courts Split on Executive Order 38 Limiting Executive Compensation
In his Health Law column, Francis J. Serbaroli reviews the status of court challenges to the Cuomo administration's regulations restricting executive compensation and administrative service expenses at health care providers and social service agencies that receive state funding. He reports that three courts have reached different conclusions regarding whether the regulations usurp legislative authority, and that the matter may ultimately have to be resolved by the Court of Appeals.
November 24, 2015 at 05:28 PM
13 minute read
In his Executive Order 38, Governor Andrew Cuomo directed 13 state agencies, including the Department of Health (DOH), to issue regulations restricting the amounts of executive compensation and administrative expenses of health care and other service providers that receive state funding. The Health Department (and the other agencies) issued regulations that were to take effect on July 1, 2013. Three separate courts have now ruled on challenges to these regulations, with two upholding all or most of the regulations, and one striking them down.
Background
Following extensive press reports about excessive compensation and benefit packages for executives of a large not-for-profit agency that served the developmentally disabled and that depended heavily upon state Medicaid funding, in 2011 Governor Cuomo appointed a task force to investigate executive compensation at not-for-profit organizations that receive support from Medicaid or other taxpayer funding. The task force collected detailed information from thousands of not-for-profit organizations in New York that provide health and social services and receive Medicaid reimbursement or other state funding.
Before the task force issued a report, the governor included in his budget to the Legislature a bill to impose caps on executive compensation and administrative costs. Before the Legislature acted (it ultimately did not include this provision in the budget), on Jan. 18, 2012, the governor issued Executive Order No. 38 (EO 38) directing the Department of Health and other state agencies to promulgate regulations prohibiting not-for-profit and for-profit entities from using state funds for executive compensation exceeding $199,000 per year, and restricting the use of state funds for administrative costs. EO 38 is applicable to organizations deemed “Covered Providers”—entities that receive more than $500,000 in state funding where that funding accounts for at least 30 percent of the organization's revenue per year, in exchange for “Program Services” to be provided to the public.
In implementing the Health Department regulations, however, the department limited the application of the EO 38 restrictions to certain entities, including hospitals, nursing homes, home health agencies, residential health care facilities, long-term and AIDS care programs, hospices, assisted living residences, emergency service entities, and health maintenance organizations and other entities authorized pursuant to Article 44 of the Public Health Law.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRapper 50 Cent Sues NYC Jeweler for $5 Million Over Imitation Necklace, Use of Image
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readAttorneys Ordered to Apologize to South Philadelphia Residents Following 'Scream Test' Experiment
5 minute readNew York's Court System Says More Work Is Needed To Clear Up Case Delays
13 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250