Scope of Federal Statutory Whistleblower Provisions
In his Corporate Litigation column, Joseph M. McLaughlin writes that the Northern District of California recently grappled with a new whistleblower protection issue: whether directors who allegedly engage in retaliatory conduct may be liable under Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank.
December 09, 2015 at 07:28 PM
14 minute read
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank) contain provisions protecting from retaliation individuals who provide information regarding a violation of U.S. securities laws. Various ambiguities in these statutory provisions have been adjudicated, most recently by the Northern District of California, which grappled with a new issue: whether directors who allegedly engage in retaliatory conduct may be liable under Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank.
In Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories,1 Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero held that directors who take retaliatory action against a whistleblowing employee by voting in favor of that employee's termination are subject to individual liability under both SOX and Dodd-Frank. In addition, the court addressed the unsettled question whether Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation protection extends to whistleblowers who report internally but not to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), joining a divided Second Circuit in according deference to the SEC's view that it does.
Statutory Background
Section 1514A of SOX protects employees of covered companies from discharge and other retaliatory action for reporting or assisting in the investigation of a violation of federal securities laws.2 Passed in 2010, Dodd-Frank enhanced and expanded pre-existing protections and bounty incentives to encourage whistleblowing, including SOX's. Dodd-Frank added Section 21F to the Securities Exchange Act, which defines a “whistleblower” as “any individual who provides…information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the Commission, in a manner established, by rule or regulation, by the Commission.”3
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250