Reducing Executive Pay Detail Contained in Proxy Statements
In his Executive Compensation column, Joseph E. Bachelder III of McCarter & English discusses the increasing quantity of executive pay information contained in proxy statements and recommends that much of the information be removed from the proxy statement and, instead, be provided as an exhibit to registrants' annual reports on Form 10-K.
December 17, 2015 at 05:58 PM
13 minute read
Today's column discusses the increasing quantity of executive pay information contained in proxy statements. This information is required by the proxy rules under SEC Regulation 14A (with many detailed requirements contained in Item 402 of Regulation S-K) and also is provided by registrants in explanations of their executive pay programs accompanying the required disclosures. The continuing increase in the amount of disclosure required in proxy statements has been dramatically illustrated by four new disclosure rules adopted or proposed in 2015. The column concludes by recommending that much of the information be removed from the proxy statement and, instead, be provided as an exhibit to registrants' annual reports on Form 10-K.
The chart on this page shows the average number of pages in proxy statements covering executive compensation for seven major U.S. public corporations at 20-year intervals starting with 1955 and ending with 2015. This group of companies was selected as being a reasonable sample of major U.S. public companies.1 Since 1955, the average has increased tenfold and the rate of increase is accelerating. From 1955 to 1975 and from 1975 to 1995, the average approximately doubled during each of these intervals. From 1995 to 2015, the average quadrupled.
Rules Adopted or Proposed
In 2015 alone, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) either adopted or proposed the following new rules (all issued pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 20102) on the dates noted:
• Adopted Final Rule on Pay Ratio Disclosure3 (under Dodd-Frank Section 953(b)) Aug. 5, 2015;
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLack of Agreement on 'Implicit' Settlement Term Insufficient to Preclude Enforcement
7 minute read'Nothing Routine' About Eric Adams Bribery, Prosecutors Tell Judge in Defending Charge
NY Lateral Partner Moves Spike, Especially in PE and Funds Practices
NYC Judge Holds Immigration Restriction Group in Contempt for Inadequate Response to AG Subpoena
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250