Arbitration Provisions in Hotel Management Agreements
In their Hospitality Litigation column, Todd Soloway and Joshua Bernstein examine the course that hotel owners and operators may chart in determining which, if any, alternative dispute resolution clause will apply to the parties' dispute.
January 12, 2016 at 10:12 PM
11 minute read
Virtually all hotel management agreements contain arbitration provisions through which both the hotel owner and manager have agreed to resolve their disputes through private dispute resolution rather than publically, in court. As we have explained in prior articles, when a hotel owner hires a hotel management company to operate its hotel and executes a hotel management agreement (HMA), there invariably exists some tension between the operator and owner with respect to the operator's responsibilities for the successful operation of the owner's hotel.
As a result, HMA's often contain a number of dispute resolution provisions, some of which are designed to resolve specific, acute issues such as disagreements over line items in an annual budget, while others are broadly tailored to resolve global problems with an operator's management of the hotel, including those that result in a default being declared under the HMA. As such, some alternative dispute resolution provisions are structured to reach a quick solution, while others naturally cause the parties to engage in a more lengthy procedure, with discovery, motions and hearings before a final determination can be reached. And even with a number of alternative dispute resolution procedures and protocols in the management agreement—in part tailored to expedite resolution but also largely motivated by keeping disputes confidential and preventing the owner and operator from airing dirty laundry—there are still carve-outs in the agreements for the owner or operator to commence an action or proceeding in court.
With multiple dispute resolution provisions often being set forth in a single agreement, it is unsurprising that there are frequently disputes between hotel owners and operators about which alternative dispute resolution clause, if any, governs the dispute presented. Thus, the improper invocation of a particular dispute resolution clause or the failure to employ the correct resolution provision often results in the parties litigating, in court or before the arbitrator, about the arbitration procedure itself, before getting to the merits of the underlying dispute.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'If You Are Aware of Areas for Improvement and You Can Play a Role in That, Speak Up,' Says Jennifer Mellott of Freshfields
- 3'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5Burns & Levinson to Wind Down After 64 Years in Boston
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250