A defense lawyer in a Bronx trial engaged in a “pervasive pattern” of win-at-all-costs misconduct that included screaming and sneering, denigrating expert witnesses and twice moving for a mistrial in front of the jury, making a new trial necessary, a Manhattan appeals court has ruled.

In a unanimous opinion Tuesday, an Appellate Division, First Department, panel upbraided New York attorney Keith McHugh for his actions during a monthlong personal injury trial in 2013.

The opinion in Smith v. Rudolph, 302983/09, affirmed a 2015 order for a retrial issued by Bronx Supreme Court Justice Edgar Walker, who had granted plaintiff Tynia Smith's post-trial motion complaining of McHugh's behavior.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT