Blockchain: The Key to True Cybersecurity?
Jeffrey D. Neuburger and Jonathan P. Mollod of Proskauer Rose discuss blockchain generally and its potential cybersecurity-related functions, security considerations when placing assets on the blockchain, and whether existing laws and regulations will have to be changed to foster new blockchain technologies.
June 06, 2017 at 12:00 AM
18 minute read
As the world rapidly shifts the underpinnings of complex global commerce to online platforms, blockchain and its distributed ledger technology may offer a compelling approach to minimizing cybersecurity risk. Because of how the blockchain is designed, transactions and related data are immutable, secure and decentralized, and may be impervious to security breaches that might affect data stored in a single, centralized place. How might companies incorporate blockchain to secure data?
This article will discuss blockchain generally and its potential cybersecurity-related functions, security considerations when placing assets on the blockchain, and whether existing laws and regulations will have to be changed to foster new blockchain technologies.
What Is Blockchain?
In a “blockchain” or distributed ledger network, individual transactions are grouped into “blocks.” As a block of transactions is verified, the block is distributed to all the participants on the network (often referred to as “nodes”), and is logically and irrevocably linked to the block before it (creating the “chain”). In this way, all of the nodes have a full and complete copy of every transaction ever conducted through that network. Unlike centralized ledger networks, the chain can be updated with a new transaction by any node on the network, with all nodes' copies of the chain being identical. In short, the principal innovation is a method to digitally send something of value without a trusted intermediary or institution. Moreover, the blockchain allows for the automatic execution and settlement of business rules without human intervention through “smart contracts.”
There are public or “permissionless” blockchains (such as that underlying Bitcoin), where anyone can be a node on the network, and the transaction ledger can be accessed by everybody. Security is accomplished through wide distribution and the use of cryptography to secure data. For developing commercial applications, the preferred implementation is a private (or “permissioned”) blockchain implementation, with limited or pre-selected participants authorized to transact on the network. In either case, however, no single entity or node controls the ledger—the network itself verifies the transactions through a “consensus mechanism.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![NYAG’s Enforcement of Mandated Cybersecurity Safeguards Sends Expensive Shock Waves through Varying Industries NYAG’s Enforcement of Mandated Cybersecurity Safeguards Sends Expensive Shock Waves through Varying Industries](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bc/78/4cc66c4642af83f4ed68ccf9d714/jessica-copeland-and-ariyana-dewitz-767x633.jpg)
NYAG’s Enforcement of Mandated Cybersecurity Safeguards Sends Expensive Shock Waves through Varying Industries
9 minute read![If 23andMe Goes Bankrupt, What Happens to All Our Data? If 23andMe Goes Bankrupt, What Happens to All Our Data?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/397/2023/11/23andMe-767x633.jpg)
![CFPB Aims to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Personal Info CFPB Aims to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Personal Info](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1a/e4/c55eab884dc49fd7d35766e85a59/cfpb-sign-2019-007-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250