Limitations on Adjudicating Disputes Involving Medicare Provider Agreements
Leslie A. Berkoff and Krista L. Kulp of Moritt Hock & Hamroff write: The power of bankruptcy courts to adjudicate Medicare provider agreements has been addressed by several circuit courts in recent years. Given the distressed nature of the health care industry and the continued bankruptcy filings by health care providers, this issue has become more prominent. However, several circuit courts determined that bankruptcy courts lack jurisdiction to adjudicate these issues; and, recently, the First Circuit took an unusual approach.
June 13, 2017 at 12:00 AM
16 minute read
The power of bankruptcy courts to adjudicate Medicare provider agreements has been addressed by several circuit courts in recent years. Given the distressed nature of the health care industry and the continued bankruptcy filings by health care providers, this issue has become more prominent. Insolvent health care providers often have issues with Medicare involving their provider agreements. However, several circuit courts determined that bankruptcy courts lack jurisdiction to adjudicate these issues; and, recently, the First Circuit took an unusual approach.
In order to receive payments from Medicare and/or Medicaid, providers must enter into provider agreements with the federal and state governments. The provider agreements provide reimbursements to providers who provide medical services to Medicare and Medicaid patients. Parkview Adventist Med. Ctr. v. United States, 842 F.3d 757, 761 (1st Cir. 2016). However, in order to qualify, providers must satisfy certain regulatory requirements and, if they do not comply, then the Department of Health and Human Services (DHS) may terminate the provider agreement without a hearing if there is an immediate threat to the health and safety of patients. See 42 U.S.C. §1395(i)-3(h)(2)(A). As Medicare reimbursement is a large or largest source of income, providers may turn to bankruptcy in order to hopefully stave off this loss of income.
However, the power of bankruptcy courts to adjudicate issues involving the Medicare Act is currently unclear. In Fla. Agency for Health Care Admin v. Bayou Shores SNF (In re Bayou Shores SNF), the Eleventh Circuit determined the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(h) and 28 U.S.C. §1334 to resolve claims under the Medicare Act. 828 F.3d at 1304. Bayou Shores SNF was a nursing facility whose income was generated from Medicare or Medicaid. Id. at 1300-01. DHS sent a letter to Bayou stating that it was “not in substantial compliance with the Medicare program requirements, and that the conditions in its facility constituted an immediate jeopardy to residents' health and safety” and that the provider agreements would terminate approximately two weeks later. Id. at 1300. Thereafter, Bayou filed for bankruptcy protection. Id. After the bankruptcy court entered an order assuming the provider agreements, the district court reversed and upheld DHS's jurisdictional challenge; Bayou then appealed. Id. at 1303-04.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
3 minute readMall of America Dealt Another Blow in Quest to End $10-Per-Year Lease With Sears
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250