'Matter of Avella v. City of New York': A Review
In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Lynn K. Neuner and William T. Russell Jr. discuss an appeal arising out of the proposed development at the former Shea Stadium site. The majority ruled that the development known as "Willets West" cannot proceed because the legislature has not clearly and expressly provided that the parkland underlying the development site can be freed from serving as a park space, as is required under the public trust doctrine, while Chief Judge Janet DiFiore reached the opposite conclusion.
June 20, 2017 at 02:05 PM
14 minute read
On June 1, 2017, the Commission on Judicial Nominations issued a list of seven candidates to fill the vacancy created by the passing of Judge Sheila Abdus-Salaam. This was two months ahead of the schedule provided for by the Judiciary Law. Gov. Andrew Cuomo had asked for the list early so that a candidate could be confirmed prior to the legislature breaking for the summer, which is currently slated to occur on June 21. From that list, Governor Cuomo has nominated current Appellate Division, First Department Associate Justice Paul Feinman. The governor's press release notes that Justice Feinman has served as a judge in New York for more than 20 years and would be the first openly gay person to serve on the Court of Appeals.
In this month's column, we address an appeal arising out of the proposed development at the former Shea Stadium site. In Matter of Avella v. City of New York, the majority of the Court of Appeals ruled that the development known as “Willets West” cannot proceed because the legislature has not clearly and expressly provided that the parkland underlying the development site can be freed from serving as a park space, as is required under the public trust doctrine. The majority opinion was authored by Judge Rowan Wilson and joined by Judges Jenny Rivera, Leslie Stein, Eugene Fahey and Michael Garcia. The lone dissent was authored by Chief Judge Janet DiFiore, who reached the opposite conclusion with equal vigor, finding it unambiguous that the legislature had already freed the 77 acres from serving as a park back in 1961 when the construction of Shea Stadium was approved.
Background
The facts are relatively straightforward. In 1961, the legislature passed Administrative Code §18-118, authorizing the City of New York to rent or lease 77 acres of Flushing Meadows Park to others for use as a stadium “with appurtenant grounds, parking areas, and other facilities.” The original goal of this legislation was to establish a second Major League Baseball team in the city. The statutory language further authorized the city to enter into contracts giving others the right to use the stadium and grounds, parking areas and other facilities for any purpose that benefits the people of the city, recreation, entertainment, amusement, education, enlightenment, cultural development or betterment, and improvement of trade and commerce, including for sporting events, musical performances, business conventions, and meetings. Shea Stadium was developed and operated on the site as the Mets' home for almost 50 years. In 2008, Shea Stadium was demolished. Citi Field, the new stadium, was built next to the original site, which has been paved over and now serves as a parking lot for Citi Field.
In 2011, the city solicited proposals to develop the blighted area consisting of 61 acres to the east of the Shea Stadium site known as Willets Point. A joint venture, which included the owner of the Mets, submitted a proposal to develop the Shea Stadium area site as Willets West, with a shopping mall containing 200 stores, a movie theater, public programming space, and a rooftop garden. The developer, Queens Development Group (QDG), would then further develop the Willets Point site with housing, a school, a hotel, retail space and a park. In 2012, the city approved QDG's proposal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRudy Giuliani's Story Arc in the Southern District of New York
You’re Sure You’ve Looked? The Use of Jackson Affidavits and Efforts to Locate Discovery Materials
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250