Fraud and Abuse Enforcement Goes High Tech
In their Federal Civil Enforcement column, Richard Strassberg and William Harrington write: The eClinicalWorks settlement and OIG report will likely prompt a significant increase in enforcement activity related to electronic health records incentive payments. The authors review these developments, their ramifications, and steps EHR companies and health care providers can take to protect themselves from liability related to EHR incentive payments below.
June 30, 2017 at 12:00 AM
20 minute read
On May 31, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice announced a $155 million settlement with electronic health records (EHR) company eClinicalWorks (eCW). The settlement resolved allegations that eCW violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by falsely certifying that its software included certain design features and functionality. The settlement marks the first resolution of an FCA case related to an incentive program that has made over $30 billion in Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments available to health care providers to promote the use of EHRs and raises questions about the potential exposure of EHR companies to FCA liability as a result of issues with software design and functionality.
Shortly after the eCW settlement was announced, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued an audit report (the OIG report) estimating that the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) paid $729.4 million in EHR incentive payments to health care providers who did not meet the criteria for demonstrating meaningful use of their EHR technology and were thus not entitled to such payments. The primary issue cited in the OIG report is the inability of the health care providers to provide documentation supporting their attestations that they met the requirements to establish meaningful use of their EHR software.
The eCW settlement and the OIG report will likely prompt a significant increase in enforcement activity related to EHR incentive payments. We review these developments, their ramifications, and steps EHR companies and health care providers can take to protect themselves from liability related to EHR incentive payments below.
Medicare, Medicaid Incentives
In 2009, to promote the adoption of EHRs, as part of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act), Congress created an incentive program under Medicare and Medicaid to reward health care providers for adopting and demonstrating meaningful use of certified EHRs. Under the incentive program, physicians and other eligible professionals such as dentists and podiatrists are eligible for a total of up to $43,720 over five years from Medicare or $63,750 over six years from Medicaid.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWorld Mental Health Day: Acknowledging Pregnancy Loss in the Legal Industry
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250