Q&A With Fidel Del Valle, Head of the NYC Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings
Fidel F. Del Valle has been involved with OATH since its inception and was named its commissioner and chief administrative law judge in 2014. He discussed how OATH has adapted to its growing role over the years and its plans for the future.
June 29, 2017 at 02:45 PM
13 minute read
Created in 1979 and added to the City Charter in 1988, the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings hears more than 800,000 cases a year from the city's enforcement agencies. Its latest expansion came on June 13, when Mayor Bill de Blasio signed the Criminal Justice Reform Act, giving OATH jurisdiction over low-level quality of life summonses issued by the New York City Police Department and Parks Department that historically were filed in Criminal Court.
OATH's reach has grown significantly over the past 20 years. It now hears all human rights complaints under the city's Human Rights Laws (1997); claims brought by city contractors arising out of terms of their agreements (1999); single-room occupancy (SRO) landlord harassment hearings (2001); retention hearings over the police-seized vehicles allegedly used in crimes (2004); violations of the Lobbying Law (2006); and denials of marriage licenses or domestic partnerships (2008).
Also in 2008, the city's largest administrative tribunal, the Environmental Control Board, was placed under OATH. Fidel F. Del Valle said a backlog of 7,000 environmental cases was eliminated while the time it took for a decision to be issued fell from an average of 96 days in 2007 to an average of just six days in 2010 “by providing hearings and appeals online, hearings by phone and educational materials for the public,” he said. In 2011, OATH grew yet again, taking administrative cases from the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the Taxi and Limousine Commission and Business Integrity Commission. And just last year, OATH began hearing all Department of Consumer Affairs cases.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn Into Service in New York
‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250