Treasury 'Core Principles' Report: Will Non-U.S. Banks Be Able to Benefit Too?
International Banking columnist Kathleen A. Scott writes that there is something for banks large and small in Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin's report on the extent to which current U.S. financial regulatory requirements promote and support seven "core principles" set out in Executive Order 13772.
July 11, 2017 at 02:05 PM
8 minute read
In my March 2017 column, various executive orders emanating from the Trump White House starting shortly after inauguration that began the president's deregulation initiative were discussed.1 Executive Order 13772 sets out administration policy to regulate the U.S. financial system consistent with seven “core principles,” and tasked the Secretary of the Treasury to report to the President on the extent to which current U.S. financial regulatory requirements promote and support the core principles or are inconsistent with them.2 On June 12, 2017, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin issued his report.3
While the report has something for banks large and small, this column will focus on the recommendations that would appear to be more relevant to non-U.S. bank operations in the United States. A non-U.S. bank with U.S. banking operations, such as a direct branch or agency, or commercial bank subsidiary, generally is treated as a U.S. holding company under most U.S. bank holding company laws and regulations.
As with the executive orders, it should be noted that mere issuance of this report does not change the current regulatory landscape. Any changes based on the report will need statutory or regulatory changes.
Background
In compiling the report, Treasury consulted with U.S. and non-U.S. financial services regulators, trade groups (including the Institute of International Bankers, the trade group for non-U.S. banks operating in the United States), U.S. and non-U.S. financial institutions, law firms and academics. The report focuses on the U.S. depository system. Subsequent reports will cover such topics as capital markets, the asset management and insurance industry, nonbank financial institutions, and financial technology and innovation.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ: TD Bank Agrees to Pay $3B Over Anti-Money Laundering Program Violations
2 minute readA Review of Fordham's Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law & Policy, and Antitrust Economics Workshop
13 minute readDOJ Files Antitrust Suit Against Visa Alleging It Thwarts Payment-Processing Rivals
Trending Stories
- 1In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 2Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 3The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 4Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 5Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250