NLRB's Acting GC, ERISA-Exempt Church Plans, FCA Seal Requirements
Labor Relations columnists David E. Schwartz and Risa M. Salins review U.S. Supreme Court decisions regarding whether the former acting general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board properly served in that role after his nomination to serve as its general counsel on a permanent basis; whether pension plans maintained by certain church-affiliated employers, but not established by a church, qualify for the church plan exemption under the ERISA; and whether qui tam whistleblower suits brought under the False Claims Act are subject to mandatory dismissal when the FCA's requirement to keep such complaints under seal is violated.
August 03, 2017 at 02:05 PM
9 minute read
This is the second of two columns discussing U.S. Supreme Court decisions from the 2016-17 term impacting employers. This month we review decisions regarding whether the former acting general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) properly served in that role after his nomination to serve as the NLRB's general counsel on a permanent basis; whether pension plans maintained by certain church-affiliated employers, but not established by a church, qualify for the church plan exemption under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA); and whether qui tam whistleblower suits brought under the False Claims Act (FCA) are subject to mandatory dismissal when the FCA's requirement to keep such complaints under seal is violated. These cases have far-reaching implications.
Acting Officials
In N.L.R.B. v. SW General, 137 S. Ct. 929 (2017), the Supreme Court ruled 6-2 that the NLRB's prior acting general counsel, Lafe Solomon, improperly served in that role from January 2011 through October 2013 while awaiting Senate confirmation to serve as the NLRB's general counsel on a permanent basis. The court concluded, based on the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA), that any person nominated to serve in an acting office could not also serve as the permanent nominee. However, it left open the possibility that not all of Solomon's actions as acting general counsel are void.
The FVRA permits three categories of government officials to perform acting service in a vacant office that requires Presidential appointment and Senate confirmation (a PAS office): the first assistant to that office, a person already serving in another PAS office, or a senior employee in the relevant agency. In June 2010, when the NLRB general counsel office became vacant, President Barack Obama directed Solomon, who spent the previous 10 years as director of the NLRB's Office of Representation Appeals, to serve as acting general counsel. In January 2011, President Obama nominated Solomon to fill the general counsel position on a permanent basis. However, the Senate never took action on the nomination. President Obama ultimately withdrew Solomon's nomination and a new nominee, Richard F. Griffin Jr., was confirmed by the Senate in October 2013. Solomon continued to serve as acting general counsel until that time.
In January 2013, an NLRB Regional Director, exercising authority on Solomon's behalf, issued an unfair labor practice complaint against an ambulance service company. The NLRB affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision that the company committed an unfair labor practice by failing to pay certain bonuses to long-term employees. The company appealed to the D.C. Circuit, arguing the unfair labor practice complaint was invalid under FVRA subsection (b)(1), which prohibits a person who the president nominates to permanently fill a vacant PAS office from temporarily carrying out the duties of that office as an acting officer. The NLRB countered that FVRA subsection (b)(1) applies only to an individual who previously served as first assistant to the applicable office, not to a senior employee in the agency like Solomon. The D.C. Circuit rejected the NLRB's argument and held Solomon became ineligible to perform the duties of general counsel in an acting capacity once the president nominated him to fill that post.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A Trip-Wire for Financial Executives
9 minute readJustices, Unanimously, Extend Reach of Federal Age-Discrimination Law
Managing New Employee Paid Leave Laws in Conjunction With ADA, FMLA and Workers' Compensation
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250