Of Fair Use, Rastafarian Photos, and Rule 12(b)(6)
Copyright Law columnists Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein write: Appropriation artist Richard Prince is back in court this summer for alleged copyright infringement, and the initial proceedings do not augur well for his current efforts to defend his "recontextualizing" of another's photograph as a fair use.
August 15, 2017 at 02:04 PM
18 minute read
Appropriation artist Richard Prince is back in court this summer for alleged copyright infringement, and the initial proceedings do not augur well for his current efforts to defend his “recontextualizing” of another's photograph as a fair use. “Appropriation art” involves taking a prior work and presenting it in a different or altered context so as to add new meaning or expression to the prior work. A work of appropriation art may or may not qualify for the fair use defense depending on how the fair use factors are balanced in evaluating the parties' works.
In 2013, readers of this column may recall, Prince won a controversial fair use ruling in the Second Circuit, Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694 (2d Cir. 2013), which held that his alterations of photographs by Patrick Cariou were sufficiently transformative to qualify as fair use of the plaintiff's works under §107 of the Copyright Act. Cariou's photos were “serene” black and white fine-art portraits of Rastafarians in Jamaica. Prince's works, a series of paintings and collages called “Canal Zone,” were variously described by the court as “crude” “jarring” “hectic” and “provocative.” Thirty of Prince's works were at issue in Cariou, and a divided panel of the Second Circuit reversed the Southern District of New York to find that 25 of them were fair use as a matter of law. The other five, involving “relatively minimal alterations” of the Cariou material, were remanded for further fact-finding. The case ultimately settled as to those remaining works in April 2014.
The following year, a different photographer, Donald Graham, sued Prince over a different fine art photo of a Rastafarian, called “Rastafarian Smoking a Joint.” Originally recognized for artistic merit and published in a photography annual in 1998, the Graham photo has since been sold in limited edition prints to fine art collectors, in sizes ranging up to four feet by five feet. At some point it was posted anonymously and without authorization to Instagram, then re-posted (again without authorization) by an Instagram user identified as rastajay92. Prince encountered the rastajay92 post on Instagram, added a brief text of self-confessed “gobblygook” in Instagram's caption space, took a screen shot, and had the result printed by inkjet on canvas, roughly four feet by five feet. The Prince image was also reproduced in a catalog for Prince's gallery show featuring the work, and for a billboard advertising the show, and a more distorted version of Graham's original was posted on Twitter by Prince himself. Unlike the “crude,” “jarring” and “provocative” changes Prince made to the Cariou photos however, he left Graham's photo essentially unaltered in “Untitled,” except for the “gobblygook” caption and some minimal cropping.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNot All Secrets Are Trade Secrets: SDNY Examines the Limits of NDA Protection
13 minute read'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute readDow Jones, New York Post Sue Perplexity AI Over Alleged Misuse of Copyrighted Works
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250