M&A in the Fashion Industry: An Employment Law Perspective
Michael R. Marra writes: Although deals differ in emphasis, labor and employment issues tend to receive less attention in a fashion or retail acquisition than big-ticket items like financial statements, material contracts, intellectual property, etc. However, ignoring labor issues comes with meaningful risks, not only for buyers, but also for prospective targets thinking about "cleaning up" their profile prior to seeking acquisition partners.
August 21, 2017 at 02:02 PM
11 minute read
On the (high) heels of the July 25 announcement that New York-based Michael Kors Holdings will acquire luxury shoe brand Jimmy Choo Plc for $1.2 billion, which followed other recent U.S. fashion and apparel deals, media interest in industry acquisitions and potential consolidations of brands is heating up. Indeed, the Michael Kors CEO made headlines by telling CNBC that he hoped the company was not done, and hoped to eventually achieve the status of a luxury group. The recent headline-grabbing announcement is just the latest in a string of fashion acquisitions across the market spectrum. Luisa Zargani, “Global M&A Activity Up 30% in 2016,” Women's Wear Daily, March 10, 2017. Whether driven by challenging macro-economic conditions and uncertain financial markets, the rise of e-commerce and m-commerce, the desire to re-brand, and/or other strategic aims of expansion, it appears we are in for a period of persistent, significant acquisition and investment in the industry—and attorneys should be prepared for the influx.
As with any deal, buyers and sellers/targets (especially those planning to shop on their own for maximum returns) will engage attorneys and bankers to assist them throughout the high stakes and complex M&A process. The buyer's attorneys and agents engage in a diligence to assess the target's assets, current and potential liabilities, and anything else that bears significantly on the value and strategic fit of the deal. Although deals differ in emphasis, labor and employment (L&E) issues tend to receive less attention than big-ticket items like financial statements, material contracts, intellectual property, etc. However, ignoring the impact of L&E issues comes with meaningful risks, not only for buyers, but also for prospective targets thinking about “cleaning up” their profile prior to seeking acquisition partners. Buyers in fashion and apparel should be especially mindful of the following issues during the diligence process (and for sellers, in advance of that process, so as to not raise red or yellow flags for buyers, their counsel, bankers and transaction insurers).1
Wage and Hour Compliance
Labor & employment attorneys know that wage and hour compliance has become the greatest source of potential liability within our practices, most notably through class and collective actions, but also pursuant to governmental audits. Some of the issues most relevant to the fashion industry include:
• The mischaracterization of employees as exempt from overtime laws
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDeal Watch: Latham, Skadden, Covington, Troutman, Fried Frank and Davis Polk Lead $10B+ Deals
8 minute readDeal Watch: Simpson, Freshfields, Wachtell Lead Big Deals as SPACs, IPOs Crank Up
11 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250