Hyman v. 400 W. 152nd St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.
Vacatur of Judgment Against Corporation Denied; Court Unpersuaded by Claimed Excuse
August 29, 2017 at 12:00 AM
3 minute read
Justice Sherry Klein Heitler
Defendant moved to vacate a judgment against it in Hyman's favor and permission to interpose an answer in this 2015 personal injury suit. Hyman sued for injuries sustained after a slip and fall in front of the subject's building. She was granted a default judgment against defendant, and an inquest was ordered on the issue of damages–at which she was awarded $250,000. A copy of the judgment with notice of entry was served on defendant by mail April 28, 2017. Defendant's president alleged he first learned of the judgment May 24, 2107 when he received a call from the City Marshall, but noted he found a letter addressed from Hyman's attorney on the floor of the building's entrance with a copy of the judgment, stating the building had problems with lost mail for years. The court was unpersuaded by defendant's claimed excuse for not appearing and the account of lost mail incredible. It noted Hyman submitted documentation with affidavits of service, including upon the Secretary of State and personal service of a claim letter on defendant's authorized agent. The court found defendant's claim of never receiving any of the numerous documents until the moment of the marshall's call “difficult to accept,” denying the motion in its entirety.
Justice
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRecent Developments With Personal Jurisdiction in Aviation Accident Products Liability Litigation
15 minute readAttorneys Ordered to Apologize to South Philadelphia Residents Following 'Scream Test' Experiment
5 minute readCPLR 5501(a)(1) and the Reviewability of Final Orders on Appeal From a Final Judgment: Reconciling a Departmental Schism
16 minute readDecision of the Day: Postal Service Shows Media Outlets' Requested Change of Address Data Is Protected
Trending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 2A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 4Data-Driven Legal Strategies
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250