Justice Joanne D. Quinones

Craddock, charged with robbery, moved to suppress a videotaped statement, and two line-up identifications. Detective Yi investigated the robbery in a park of two complainants who reported their cell phones were taken at gun point, describing the two assailants, including Craddock. Yi input the address of the tracked iPhone into the NYPD's Das Light system–permitting a search by various key words, including address. Both complainant's identified Craddock in the photographs viewed. Yi conducted two line-ups and both complainants identified Craddock, who was then arrested. Craddock was read Miranda warnings and agreed to speak with Yi but requested counsel 14 minutes into the interview and questioning stopped. The court held a combined Huntley/Wade/Dunaway hearing, finding that information available to police by the two identified citizen complainants established sufficient probable cause for Craddock's arrest. As Craddock expressly waived Miranda rights, his statement was voluntary. Further, despite the court finding the photo array suggestive, it found the 9 day attenuation period between the array and the lineup sufficient to dissipate any taint of suggestiveness. Identifications were not the result of an unduly suggestive procedure and suppression was denied.