First in the Nation Right to Counsel Law for Low-Income Tenants in NYC
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed into law on Aug. 11 a Right to Counsel in Housing Court bill that had overwhelmingly been passed by the New York City Council. The law is the first of its kind in the United States and provides free legal representation for individuals and families who are defendants in eviction proceedings in Housing Court or respondents in administrative proceedings before the New York City Housing Authority seeking termination of a tenancy and possession of the rental dwelling unit.
September 05, 2017 at 02:00 PM
8 minute read
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed into law on Aug. 11, 2017 a Right to Counsel in Housing Court bill that had overwhelmingly been passed by the New York City Council (Intro 214-B). The law is the first of its kind in the United States and provides free legal representation for individuals and families who are defendants in eviction proceedings in Housing Court or respondents in administrative proceedings before the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) seeking termination of a tenancy and possession of the rental dwelling unit. Mayor de Blasio stated that the law is intended to make sure that families do not end up in shelters when they could be staying in their homes. Homelessness has increased in NYC in recent years.
The law will provide full legal representation for all individuals and families with income under 200 percent of the federal poverty level—about $48,000 for a family of four. Such full legal representation includes ongoing advice, advocacy, including appearing in Housing Court or administrative proceedings on behalf of the tenant, and other assistance associated with such representation. Tenants with income that exceeds 200 percent of the federal poverty level will be eligible to receive “brief legal assistance,” defined as individualized legal assistance provided in a single consultation. All legal services will be provided by not-for-profit organizations that have the capacity to provide such legal services and are designated by the Coordinator.
Specifically, the law requires the Civil Justice Coordinator of the NYC Office of Civil Justice to establish programs that provide all tenants facing eviction in Housing Court with access to legal services within five years, i.e., no later than July 31, 2022. By Oct. 1, 2017, the coordinator also is required to establish a program that provides legal services to all tenants of buildings operated by the NYCHA in administrative proceedings for the purpose of terminating their tenancies. Access to such legal services also must be provided by July 31, 2022.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Supreme Court Justices Pass on Landlord Challenge to NY Rent Stabilization
2 minute readEstablishing the Prevailing Party; Failure To Comply With LLC Law; Takings Claim: This Week in Scott Mollen's Realty Law Digest
Landlord Retaliation; Good Cause Eviction Law; Brokerage Commissions: This Week in Scott Mollen's Realty Law Digest
Decision of the Day: Landlord Cannot Serve Eviction Warrant on 13-Year-Old
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250