Correspondent Banking Update
In her International Banking column, Kathleen A. Scott highlights some of the recent efforts by international organizations to attempt to address the increasing trend for some banks terminating their banking account relationships with banks in certain areas of the world.
September 14, 2017 at 12:00 AM
19 minute read
Last year, in September, I discussed the increasing trend for some banks to terminate their banking account relationships with banks in certain areas of the world. Kathleen A. Scott, “Work Continues on Addressing Correspondent Banking Decline,” New York Law Journal, Sept. 16, 2016. In this month's column, I highlight some of the recent efforts by international organizations to attempt to address this trend, which unfortunately continues today.
A Little Background
As explained in my September 2016 column, funds transfer around the globe by use of accounts banks maintain with each other—most of them maintained by banks (respondents) at large international banks (correspondents), primarily in the United States, Canada, Europe and the United Kingdom. If the correspondent banks see a higher risk in maintaining those accounts and decide to close them, respondent banks have increasing difficulty accessing the international financial system, which can to consequences such as curtailing international business transactions and impeding the ability for residents of these countries to receive remittances from relatives working abroad.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) a group of international banking regulators, has been working on this issue and established the Correspondent Banking Coordination Group (CBCG). This organization has been submitting periodic reports to the G-20, the group of international finance ministers and central bank governors. Its latest report was submitted to the G-20 at its July meeting in Germany. Financial Stability Board, “FSB action plan to assess and address the decline in correspondent banking,” July 4, 2017.
In addition, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the international organization developing anti-money laundering standards, issued guidance on Correspondent Banking Services issued shortly after last year's column appeared, and the Basel Committee of the Bank for International Settlements issued revisions in June to its correspondent banking guidance contained in its anti-money laundering guidelines. Financial Action Task Force, “Correspondent Banking Services,” Oct. 21, 2016; Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism,” June 2017.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute readDOJ: TD Bank Agrees to Pay $3B Over Anti-Money Laundering Program Violations
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250