Lawyers: Blow the Whistle at Your Own Risk
In his Tax Litigation Issues column, Jeremy H. Temkin writes that whistleblowing is alive and well at the IRS, but, while attorneys are not precluded from participating, attorneys need to be mindful of the strict interpretation of what it means for an attorney to "reasonably believe" a disclosure is necessary to prevent a client from committing a crime under New York professional conduct rules.
September 20, 2017 at 02:05 PM
18 minute read
Over a decade after the IRS's Whistleblower Office was established, whistleblowing is alive and well. According to its annual report to Congress, while the IRS rejected more than 12,000 whistleblower claims in FY 2016, it also paid 418 awards totaling more than $61 million.1 As the number of claims increases, so does the likelihood that attorneys will find themselves in an ethical tangle as they consider whether they can appropriately pursue monetary awards for reporting malfeasance by their clients. While the IRS's rules do not preclude attorneys from participating, IRS Chief Counsel Notice 2010-004 makes clear that “[u]nder no circumstances is it appropriate” for the IRS to accept information about a taxpayer from an informant who is “that taxpayer's representative in any administrative matter pending before the IRS,” and the Internal Revenue manual recognizes that “whistleblower information…subject to a valid claim of privilege, may create risks if used by the IRS.”2
The possibility of ethical quagmires for putative attorney-whistleblowers is driven home by a recent ruling by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. On Aug. 30, 2017, the board recommended the suspension of former General Electric in-house counsel Adriana Koeck for her disclosure of confidential GE data to multiple authorities and the press as part of purported whistleblowing activity. The sanctions against Koeck are a stark reminder of the risks attorneys face in blowing the whistle on their employers or clients.
'Koeck'
Koeck worked at GE from January 2006 to January 2007. Immediately before a meeting at which her employment was to be terminated, Koeck sent an email to GE's corporate ombudsman claiming that her imminent termination was in retaliation for her discovery and reporting of tax fraud purportedly perpetrated by GE in Brazil. After reporting to the ombudsman, Koeck made a copy of her office hard drive.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250