PER CURIAM

Cuthbert appealed from two judgments convicting him of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest. It was alleged he yelled obscenities in public after an officer asked him to move his vehicle from an intersection after an accident. Cuthbert was also charged with resisting arrest for intentionally attempting to prevent an officer for effectuating an authorized arrest. Trial testimony revealed Cuthbert's van was hit by another car at an intersection and he complied with an officer's request to move the van to the side of the road but then was involved in a dispute with the officer and raised his voice while using profanity. Cuthbert alleged the information claimed the dispute was confined exclusively to him and the officer, thus, was jurisdictionally defective as it did not allege any public dimension to the incident. The panel found there was no allegation any people were present or if there was traffic at the intersection as the only allegation the incident had a public dimension was that it occurred “in public.” The information was jurisdictionally defective as it contained insufficient allegations the altercation extended beyond Cuthbert and the officer and had a public dimension. Thus, the information charging resisting arrest was also jurisdictionally defective and judgments were reversed.