Chelsea Bomber Convicted Swiftly by Federal Jury in Manhattan
After a little more than four hours of deliberations, the jury in the Southern District of New York convicted Ahmad Khan Rahimi of eight counts, including using a weapon of mass destruction and bombing a public place.
October 16, 2017 at 02:57 PM
4 minute read
A federal jury on Monday swiftly convicted a man inspired by the Islamic State and al Qaeda of planting bombs on the streets of Chelsea in a September 2016 attack that injured 30 people in a hail of shrapnel and blown-out windows.
After a little more than four hours of deliberations, the jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York convicted Ahmad Khan Rahimi of eight counts, including using a weapon of mass destruction and bombing a public place. The verdict followed a two-week trial that also charged Rahimi with setting up and leaving pipe bombs in Seaside Park, New Jersey, and Elizabeth, New Jersey.
“On Sept. 17, 2016, Ahmad Khan Rahimi attacked our country and our way of life,” Acting Manhattan U.S. Attorney Joon Kim said in a statement released this morning. “Inspired by ISIS and al Qaeda, Rahimi planted and detonated bombs on the streets of Chelsea, in the heart of Manhattan, and in New Jersey, hoping to kill and maim as many innocent people as possible. Rahimi's crimes of hate have been met with swift and resolute justice.”
Rahimi, a 29-year-old from Afghanistan who was living a mostly solitary life in Elizabeth, faces a mandatory life sentence. His sentencing is slated for Jan. 18.
As the jury announced its guilty verdict, Rahimi, wearing a wrinkled blue shirt, stared straight ahead and at the jurors themselves, showing little emotion. It was in contrast to the trial's first day when he suddenly yelled out in court about his wife not having clearance to visit him while he was in custody.
Over two days in September 2016, Rahimi went on a bomb-hiding and detonation spree that spanned two states and included both pressure-cooker and pipe bombs. A lone-wolf attacker inspired by internet calls for jihad, he toted around nine bombs in all. Most ultimately did not explode.
He began by setting up a pipe bomb in a trash can near the finish line of a U.S. Marine Corps charity race in Seaside Park. No one was harmed when the bomb went off.
Later the same day he traveled through Manhattan's Penn Station and walked through Chelsea. He set up two pressure-cooker bombs on crowded streets on a warm summer evening. One exploded on 23rd Street, throwing a Dumpster 120 feet into the air, shattering windows and injuring 30 people. The fact that no one was killed, according to prosecutors, amounted to a miracle.
The same evening, a passersby discovered a bomb on a different Chelsea street. It was later disarmed by the police bomb squad. The following day, Rahimi returned to New Jersey and left six pipe bombs in a backpack at a local train station. A bomb squad was able to handle the bombs without incident.
That the jury came back quickly with a unanimous verdict on Monday morning, after closing arguments wrapped on Friday, came as little surprise to observers of the trial.
In his closing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Emil Bove pointed to a large amount of evidence against Rahimi.
His fingerprints and DNA were found on bombs. Video cameras in Manhattan had tracked his movements as he hauled bombs in suitcases through Chelsea, and they showed the explosion on 23rd Street in Chelsea that injured 30 people.
In addition, there was a notebook for jurors to review. It was found on Rahimi when he was arrested after the attack following a shootout with New Jersey police.
The prosecutor said Rahimi's words provided a confession as he took responsibility for the bombings in a “claim of credit” for the attacks.
Assistant public defender Sabrina Shroff did not deny evidence linking Rahimi to the 23rd Street bomb that exploded, but asked jurors to consider whether Rahimi intended for the unexploded 27th Street bomb to go off.
She asked the jury to acquit Rahimi of three charges that could result in a mandatory life prison sentence.
After the verdict was announced Monday, the defense promised to appeal.
Rahimi also still faces separate charges in New Jersey tied to the shootout.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250