Allergan-St. Regis Mohawk Patent Deal Too Clever By Half
Allergan should have learned from payday lenders: Hiding behind tribal sovereign immunity is not as easy as it looks.In September, Allergan rocked…
October 20, 2017 at 10:10 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Allergan should have learned from payday lenders: Hiding behind tribal sovereign immunity is not as easy as it looks.
In September, Allergan rocked the IP world by transferring patents to its best-selling eye drug Restasis to the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe. The Tribe paid nothing for Restasis—in fact, Allergan paid the Tribe $13.75 million to take Restasis off its hands. Allergan also agreed to pay the tribe some $15 million annually for the privilege of leasing back rights to the drug it used to own.
Paying to transfer rights to a drug may seem bizarre, but it could be worth several billion dollars to Allergan. The company hopes to use tribal sovereign immunity to shield its patents from challenges by companies hoping to sell generic versions of the drug. The US Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which hears these challenges, recently held that the sovereign immunity of state universities bars challenges to patents they own. Because tribal sovereign immunity generally follows state sovereign immunity, if the deals work, Allergan could extend its monopoly on Restasis—and keep its billion-plus annual revenue—for much longer.
For the St. Regis Mohawk tribe, too, this seems like a no-brainer. Selling sovereign immunity threatens tribal sovereignty in the long term by creating a false impression that tribes are sham sovereigns. But because the St. Regis Mohawk is a real sovereign working to support its citizens, $15 million a year is understandably hard to pass up. The tribe is a lone economic bright spot in an otherwise depressed area on the New York-Canada border. It's the major employer for tribal citizens, and it struggles to maintain community cohesion across a tightening international border. Intent on diversifying its economic resources, the tribe had already acquired several computer patents earlier this year.
But the fate of similar attempts to use sovereign immunity in payday lending schemes shows the pitfalls of the deal. To escape from state laws that prohibit the sky-high interest rates payday lenders charge, a number of lenders partnered with tribes and for years used sovereign immunity to fend off state regulators. But the success of this strategy has now largely collapsed. New York issued cease-and-desist orders to the off-reservation banks that facilitated the loans. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which as an arm of the United States is not blocked by sovereign immunity, is cracking down as well. Most threatening for Allergan, a jury just found Scott Tucker, the race car driver behind several of these tribal payday lending schemes, guilty of criminal fraud for orchestrating sham tribal partnerships to evade the law.
Criminal prosecutions probably won't ensue here, but that's because of the weakest part of the deal. Allergan isn't even pretending the tribe has anything more than naked ownership. Tribal businesses have sovereign immunity only so long as they are considered “arms of the tribe.” They must not only be owned by the tribe, they must be meaningfully controlled by the tribe. Tribal colleges count. So do tribal casinos. But patent deals where the manufacturer actually pays the tribe for its “ownership” and immediately leases the patents back? Probably not.
Although Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., has already proposed a bill to abrogate tribal sovereign immunity in such patent actions, it is unlikely to pass. But the scars to the perceptions of tribes will be much more long-standing. And the viability of Allergan's deal is likely to fall apart long before they fade.
Bethany R. Berger holds the Wallace Stevens Professorship at the University of Connecticut School of Law and is a leading expert on federal Indian law
Allergan should have learned from payday lenders: Hiding behind tribal sovereign immunity is not as easy as it looks.
In September, Allergan rocked the IP world by transferring patents to its best-selling eye drug Restasis to the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe. The Tribe paid nothing for Restasis—in fact, Allergan paid the Tribe $13.75 million to take Restasis off its hands. Allergan also agreed to pay the tribe some $15 million annually for the privilege of leasing back rights to the drug it used to own.
Paying to transfer rights to a drug may seem bizarre, but it could be worth several billion dollars to Allergan. The company hopes to use tribal sovereign immunity to shield its patents from challenges by companies hoping to sell generic versions of the drug. The US Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which hears these challenges, recently held that the sovereign immunity of state universities bars challenges to patents they own. Because tribal sovereign immunity generally follows state sovereign immunity, if the deals work, Allergan could extend its monopoly on Restasis—and keep its billion-plus annual revenue—for much longer.
For the St. Regis Mohawk tribe, too, this seems like a no-brainer. Selling sovereign immunity threatens tribal sovereignty in the long term by creating a false impression that tribes are sham sovereigns. But because the St. Regis Mohawk is a real sovereign working to support its citizens, $15 million a year is understandably hard to pass up. The tribe is a lone economic bright spot in an otherwise depressed area on the New York-Canada border. It's the major employer for tribal citizens, and it struggles to maintain community cohesion across a tightening international border. Intent on diversifying its economic resources, the tribe had already acquired several computer patents earlier this year.
But the fate of similar attempts to use sovereign immunity in payday lending schemes shows the pitfalls of the deal. To escape from state laws that prohibit the sky-high interest rates payday lenders charge, a number of lenders partnered with tribes and for years used sovereign immunity to fend off state regulators. But the success of this strategy has now largely collapsed.
Criminal prosecutions probably won't ensue here, but that's because of the weakest part of the deal. Allergan isn't even pretending the tribe has anything more than naked ownership. Tribal businesses have sovereign immunity only so long as they are considered “arms of the tribe.” They must not only be owned by the tribe, they must be meaningfully controlled by the tribe. Tribal colleges count. So do tribal casinos. But patent deals where the manufacturer actually pays the tribe for its “ownership” and immediately leases the patents back? Probably not.
Although Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., has already proposed a bill to abrogate tribal sovereign immunity in such patent actions, it is unlikely to pass. But the scars to the perceptions of tribes will be much more long-standing. And the viability of Allergan's deal is likely to fall apart long before they fade.
Bethany R. Berger holds the Wallace Stevens Professorship at the
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Expanding Strength of U.S. Patents Beyond U.S. Shores
Trending Stories
- 1The Moving Goalposts of Overtime Exemption: Texas Judge Invalidates 2024 Salary Threshold Rule
- 2New Research Study Predicts Continued Growth for Generative AI in Legal
- 3Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Office & Dragons
- 4Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 5Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250