Trial Begins in AG's First Prosecution of Police Shooting
Officer Wayne Isaacs is accused of shooting an unarmed man during an alleged road rage incident. Isaacs claims it was self-defense.
October 23, 2017 at 06:56 PM
4 minute read
In opening statements in the murder trial of New York City police Officer Wayne Isaacs, who's accused of shooting and killing unarmed civilian Delrawn Small, a prosecutor from the New York Attorney General's Office said Monday that the officer initiated the fatal encounter by cutting Small off in traffic.
But an attorney for Isaacs, the first police officer to be prosecuted by the state attorney general for killing an unarmed civilian since the office was given the authority to investigate such cases in 2015, argued Small was the aggressor and that Isaacs fired the three rounds that took Small's life in self-defense.
The trial for Isaacs, who's charged with second-degree murder and first-degree manslaughter, presents an initial test for the Special Investigations and Prosecutions Unit created within the Attorney General's Office to handle police shootings.
Isaacs was off-duty and in plainclothes in the early morning hours of July 4, 2016, following his shift with the 79th Precinct in the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn.
Isaacs first encountered Small at the intersection of Atlantic Avenue and Bradford Street in the Cypress Hills neighborhood in Brooklyn, where Assistant Attorney General Jose Nieves said Isaacs cut Small off in traffic.
Small became upset over the incident, Nieves said, and approached Isaacs' vehicle. Isaacs acted quickly, firing three rounds into Small, the prosecutor said, then “strolled” past Small and called 911 to report that Small assaulted him.
“At the end of this case, the evidence will show that the defendant shot and killed Delrawn Small and that he had no legal justification to do so,” Nieves said.
Nieves also said Isaacs neglected to identify himself as a police officer before he shot Small, which drew an objection from defense attorney Stephen Worth. Brooklyn Criminal Court Judge Alexander Jeong overruled.
Assistant Attorney General Joshua Gradinger is also prosecuting the case.
During opening arguments from the defense, Worth, a partner at Worth, Longworth & London, argued Small was legally drunk from a Fourth of July party he attended before the altercation with Isaacs—a contention that drew an objection from the prosecution that Jeong overruled—and that there was no “road rage” incident prior to the shooting.
Worth also noted that Small's girlfriend described him as someone who gets “so angry, so fast” and that Small crossed two lanes of traffic to confront Isaacs.
“He's a menace, he's angry, he's intoxicated and he in fact assaults Mr. Isaacs,” Worth said.
Isaacs is also represented by Michael Martinez of Worth Longworth.
On Monday, jurors also heard testimony from a New York City detective who investigated the scene, Isaacs' supervisor and an emergency medical technician who responded.
During the testimony of the EMT, Catherine Renta, jurors were shown a black-and-white photo of Small's body while lying on the pavement, at which point members of Small's family were visibly shaken.
Nieves told jurors that the evidence presented in the trial will include video footage of the shooting captured from a nearby surveillance camera. Video of the shooting was publicly released last year.
In July 2015, in the midst of a public outcry over police killings of unarmed civilians, Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed an executive order giving prosecutorial powers to the New York Attorney General for cases in which an officer caused the death of an unarmed civilian.
Among the cases that stoked public ire was the July 2014 death of Eric Garner, who New York City police Officer Daniel Pantaleo placed in a fatal chokehold. A grand jury on Staten Island declined to indict Pantaleo for Garner's death.
Isaacs is the only officer to be charged so far, while other incidents are still under investigation.
“Our Special Investigations and Prosecutions Unit is committed to following the facts wherever they may lead, without fear or favor,” said Amy Spitalnick, a spokeswoman for New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's office, said in an email. “We look forward to proving our case in court.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250