The Facts About New York's Paid Family Leave Law
Paid Family Leave allows employees to take time off for the birth or adoption of a child, to care for a close relative with a serious medical condition or to raise a family while a spouse is deployed for active military service.
October 24, 2017 at 02:00 PM
4 minute read
Private employers across New York are gearing up to implement the state's new Paid Family Leave law on Jan. 1, 2018.
Paid Family Leave allows employees to take time off for the birth or adoption of a child, to care for a close relative with a serious medical condition or to raise a family while a spouse is deployed for active military service. Employees receive a percentage of their average weekly wage, but limited to an equal percentage of the state's average weekly wage. They also maintain their health insurance benefits, and they are assured of reinstatement when their leave ends.
New York is phasing in its Paid Family Leave over four years. During that time, the amount of paid leave and the percentage of wages paid to the employee increase as follows:
• 2018: eight weeks of leave, 50 percent of employee's average weekly wage, up to 50 percent of state average weekly wage
• 2019: 10 weeks of leave, 55 percent of employee's average weekly wage, up to 50 percent of state average weekly wage
• 2020: 10 weeks of leave, 60 percent of employee's average weekly wage, up to 60 percent of state average weekly wage
• 2021: 12 weeks of leave, 67 percent of employee's average weekly wage, up to 67 percent of state average weekly wage
Employees are eligible for Paid Family Leave after 26 weeks on the job (for those working 20 or more hours per week) or 175 days (for those working less than 20 hours). Employers may require employees to continue contributing towards their company's health insurance plan while on Paid Family Leave.
Employees are asked to give 30 days' advance notice to their employers when requesting Paid Family Leave, if possible. Employers must give a claim form to the employee, or else give the employee information on obtaining a form from the company's insurer—which pays for Paid Family Leave—or the state's Paid Family Leave website. Employers must then pass along pertinent information to their insurers, such as the dates the employee will be out of work and how much the pay will be. The insurers have 18 days to process the claim and issue an official determination of benefits.
The majority of insurance carriers include Paid Family Leave as part of their disability insurance policy packages, so employers may discover that they are already covered. If they are not covered, employers must absorb an increase in their monthly premium payments to get the additional coverage. Employers can authorize a small payroll deduction to cover any additional costs, but it can be no more than 0.126 percent of an employee's weekly wage and is capped at 0.126 percent of the state's average weekly wage.
Employers have the right to hire temporary workers to fill in for an employee who is on Paid Family Leave, but this should be stated up front. If an employer decides to retain the temporary employee, they must offer the returning employee a comparable job. If the returning employee is not reinstated, employers could be brought before the New York State Division of Human Rights for discrimination or retaliation claims, which could lead to fines and associated court costs.
If they have not already done so, employers must display posters explaining Paid Family Leave coverage for their employees and should state their company's policies in their human resources handbooks. Employers should also take the time to find out how Paid Family Leave interacts with other federal, state and local laws such as the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), New York State Human Rights Law and New York City's Paid Sick Leave law. For instance, FMLA allows an employer to require an employee use FMLA leave concurrently with other types of paid or unpaid sick leave. Employers should consult a labor and employment attorney to determine their best practices for implementing Paid Family Leave, since they must maintain compliance with all other laws.
With a little more than two months remaining before New Year's Day, employers need to prepare now for the implementation of Paid Family Leave.
Michael W. Macomber is a partner at Tully Rinckey where he is the section chair of the firm's New York state employment law practice group. Nicholas Devyatkin, an associate at the firm, represents employees in federal, state and private employment law matters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTik Tok’s ‘Blackout Challenge’ Confronts the Limits of CDA Section 230 Immunity
6 minute readEnemy of the State: Foreign Sovereign Immunity and Criminal Prosecutions after ‘Halkbank’
10 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250