Market Claims Fund Managers Trying to 'Steal' Exchange-Traded Funds
NASDAQ, the world's second-largest stock exchange, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Thursday against a New Jersey fund management company, claiming it is attempting to steal a number of multimillion-dollar exchange-traded funds in its care.
October 26, 2017 at 05:02 PM
3 minute read
NASDAQ, the world's second-largest stock exchange, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Thursday against a New Jersey fund management company, claiming it is attempting to steal a number of multimillion-dollar exchange-traded funds in its care.
ETF Managers Group was contracted by the stock exchange, as part of an agreement reached with a company purchased by NASDAQ in 2016, to manage the PureFunds line of ETFs, according to the complaint in NASDAQ v. ETF Managers Group, 17-cv-08252.
The complaint states that ETF Managers has operated the funds since 2015. The funds, first launched in 2012, focus on a number of areas, such as video games and cybersecurity. The latter fund has more than $1 billion in assets under management, NASDAQ claims.
According to NASDAQ, the relationship between ETF Managers and the stock exchange hit a turbulent period that culminated in a letter from ETF Managers CEO Samuel Masucci to NASDAQ and its partner in the creation of the funds, PureFunds. In it, Masucci allegedly stated that PureFunds and NASDAQ had improper communications with ETF Managers as well as outside parties, and noted a lawsuit, filed in Superior Court in New Jersey by PureFunds, that alleged similar aims by ETF Managers as the NASDAQ suit—namely, that the managers were attempting to obtain control of the funds.
Masucci told NASDAQ it was terminating its agreement to produce the profits of three of the funds to NASDAQ and PureFunds.
“The only logical conclusion that can be drawn from these actions is that defendants sought to seize control of the PureFunds ETFs and the profits they generate, and manufactured a means of achieving these goals,” the complaint stated.
Since then, ETF Managers has changed the names on the funds, removing “PureFunds” from the titles. However, the tickers associated with the funds remain the same. Of greater material consequence, according to NASDAQ, the ETF Managers hasn't paid profits on the ETFs since March, which total more than $1.2 million.
Ballard Spahr associate Justin W. Lamson is representing NASDAQ. He referred a request for comment to a NASDAQ spokesman who declined to comment.
On top of the breach of duty claims, NASDAQ also alleges ETF Managers' decision to switch distributors represents a breach of the wholesaling agreement, resulting in an additional $600,000 in associated fees.
A spokesman for ETF Managers could not be reached.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250