Upstate Jury Awards $1M to Bullied Student
A Sullivan County jury found that a school district that allegedly turned a “blind eye” to severe bullying inflicted upon one of its students should pay $1 million in damages to the student's family.
October 30, 2017 at 05:52 PM
4 minute read
Fotolia
A Sullivan County jury found that a school district that allegedly turned a “blind eye” to severe bullying inflicted upon one of its students should pay $1 million in damages to the student's family.
The jury awarded $300,000 for past damages, $640,000 for future damages and $30,000 for each of the parents of Anthony Motta Jr., who endured both physical and verbal bullying from 2011 to 2013 while he was a student at the Eldred School District in upstate New York.
The verdict is subject to a judge's approval, and the school district made an oral motion in court to challenge the award for being too excessive, said JenniElena Rubino, an attorney for the Motta family, in an interview.
Rubino said that Motta endured anti-gay slurs from fellow students, regardless of the fact that he is heterosexual. Court papers state that he also suffered physical abuse at the hands of classmates, such as being urinated upon.
The harassment caused him to run into disciplinary problems, court papers state, as well as suffer academically.
Acting Sullivan County Supreme Court Justice Michael McGuire dismissed Motta's suit in 2015, but in July 2016, a panel of the Appellate Division, Third Department, reinstated the suit, finding that Motta adequately pleaded negligent supervision on behalf of the school district.
Rubino said she felt that the jury's verdict, which was handed up last week, was intended to “send a message to the community.”
“You can't turn a blind eye to the bullying that goes on,” she said.
Jean-Paul Le Du of the Rubino Law Firm also appeared for the Motta family.
In a statement to the Times Herald-Record, school district officials said they were disappointed by the verdict and that district staff is “attentive, watchful and supportive.”
“The district provides training to staff, and students participate in numerous programs designed to prevent bullying and promote civility and acceptance,” the statement reads.
Fotolia
A Sullivan County jury found that a school district that allegedly turned a “blind eye” to severe bullying inflicted upon one of its students should pay $1 million in damages to the student's family.
The jury awarded $300,000 for past damages, $640,000 for future damages and $30,000 for each of the parents of Anthony Motta Jr., who endured both physical and verbal bullying from 2011 to 2013 while he was a student at the Eldred School District in upstate
The verdict is subject to a judge's approval, and the school district made an oral motion in court to challenge the award for being too excessive, said JenniElena Rubino, an attorney for the Motta family, in an interview.
Rubino said that Motta endured anti-gay slurs from fellow students, regardless of the fact that he is heterosexual. Court papers state that he also suffered physical abuse at the hands of classmates, such as being urinated upon.
The harassment caused him to run into disciplinary problems, court papers state, as well as suffer academically.
Acting Sullivan County Supreme Court Justice Michael McGuire dismissed Motta's suit in 2015, but in July 2016, a panel of the Appellate Division, Third Department, reinstated the suit, finding that Motta adequately pleaded negligent supervision on behalf of the school district.
Rubino said she felt that the jury's verdict, which was handed up last week, was intended to “send a message to the community.”
“You can't turn a blind eye to the bullying that goes on,” she said.
Jean-Paul Le Du of the Rubino Law Firm also appeared for the Motta family.
In a statement to the Times Herald-Record, school district officials said they were disappointed by the verdict and that district staff is “attentive, watchful and supportive.”
“The district provides training to staff, and students participate in numerous programs designed to prevent bullying and promote civility and acceptance,” the statement reads.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute readGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readJudge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250