Ex-NYT Columnist's Defamation Suit Survives, Challenging Film Portrayal as Cad
A former columnist for The New York Times can pursue his defamation claim against a company that produced a film based on an article penned by his former wife that portrays him as a philanderer, a Manhattan judge has ruled.
October 31, 2017 at 06:22 PM
2 minute read
A former columnist for The New York Times can pursue his defamation claim against a company that produced a film based on an article penned by his former wife that portrays him as a philanderer, a Manhattan judge has ruled.
Randy Cohen, who formerly wrote “The Ethicist” column for The New York Times Magazine, said he was defamed by the trailer for the film “Learning to Drive,” which is based on an article that his ex-wife Katha Pollitt—who is not a party to Cohen's suit—wrote for The New Yorker.
In the trailer, a book critic allegedly based on Pollitt tells her daughter: “Instead of buying a motorcycle, daddy decided to give adultery a spin.”
Also in the trailer, which says that the film is based on a true story, the main character asks her friend, “Where does he find these skanks?”
In an Oct. 23 decision published Monday, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Lucy Billings denied a motion to dismiss the suit filed by Broad Green Pictures, which produced the film.
Billings found that people who know Cohen are likely to know that he used to be married to Pollitt and may come away with the impression that Cohen is a “womanizer keeping company with sleazy and sexually promiscuous women.”
Cohen is represented by solo attorney Richard Altman and David Feige of Giskan Solotaroff & Anderson. In an interview, Altman said the injury to his client amounted to “libel by fiction.”
“Adultery does remain a crime in the state of New York,” Altman added. (Adultery is a class B misdemeanor in New York.)
Katherine Bolger of Davis Wright Tremaine appeared for the production company. On Monday, Bolger filed a notice of appeal to challenge Billings' decision. She did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York Court of Appeals Blocks Trump Attempt to Stay Friday Sentencing
Balancing Judicial Authority: Understanding Sanctions, Severance, and Interferences
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
- 2Here's What Corporate Litigators Expect Del. Courts to Address in 2025
- 3U.S. Supreme Court Has No Jurisdiction Over Trump's New York Criminal Case: Prosecutors
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: With KPMG's Proposed Entry, Arizona's Liberalized Legal Market is Getting Interesting
- 5Womble Bond Dickinson Adds New Leaders as Merger Is Completed
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250