Commercial Division Pilot Program Aimed at $50M-Plus Cases Set to Launch
The Commercial Division Advisory Council has said that the Large Complex Case List will help make clear that “the London Commercial Court is not entitled to a monopoly on large lawsuits.”
November 01, 2017 at 10:14 AM
8 minute read
A “Large Complex Case List,” aimed at more efficiently managing cases where a minimum of $50 million is at issue, is to be formed in the Manhattan Supreme Court's Commercial Division as a pilot program, according to a court administration order.
The program, set to begin Jan. 1, comes after the Commercial Division Advisory Council proposed the idea for a high-stakes case list earlier this year. The council has said that the case list will help make clear that “the London Commercial Court is not entitled to a monopoly on large lawsuits.”
In 2015, the U.K. court instituted its “Financial List,” a separate docket of financial cases worth at least 50 million pounds ($65.2 million). The Large Complex Case List is viewed by council members as a way to more ardently compete for high-stakes litigations while improving the operations and speed of an overtaxed state court system.
According to a report prepared by a council subcommittee, large “complex” cases would benefit from procedures and tools that facilitate a quicker resolution. Dedicated resources would include special referees with expertise in discovery such as that of federal court magistrate judges, backup settlement judges and special mediators, and technology that streamlines the exchange of documents and active case management.
The court administration order, signed by Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks on Oct. 23 and approved by the Administrative Board after public comment, states in part that Manhattan Commercial Division justices “may designate a case for the List, either sua sponte or upon application by a party, if it (i) addresses commercial claims for an amount no less than $50 million (exclusive of punitive damages, interest, costs, disbursements, and counsel fees); or (ii) addresses matters of sufficient complexity and importance to warrant such designation.”
It adds that “justices presiding over such cases may, in their discretion, apply procedures and make available to the parties such court resources as may be available (including but not limited to special referees with expertise in discovery, special mediators, settlement judges, interface options with extranets and electronic document depositories, and hyperlinked briefs) commensurate with the requirements of active case management of the largest and most complex matters in the Commercial Division.”
David Tennant, a Rochester-based Nixon Peabody partner and advisory council member, said Tuesday that “there is a possibility that it [the case list] will be expanded to other courts” in New York state, depending on the effectiveness of the pilot program.
He added that the program doesn't have an end date, and that court administration will be evaluating the program and considering next steps.
“The advisory council will be interested in seeing how it plays out in the real world,” as well, he said. “There is a belief that there are a substantial number of cases that will meet the threshold.”
The council's subcommittee report said the U.K. court's financial list is “clearly designed by the U.K. courts to promote London as the premier jurisdiction for resolution of commercial disputes, both to benefit the English judiciary and bar and to enhance the attractiveness of London as a global financial center.”
It added, “We believe it is in the best interest of the Commercial Division, the New York judiciary and more broadly the New York business community to respond. We believe the Commercial Division can do so in a tailored, low-cost and low-risk way.”
Jeff Storey contributed reporting.
A “Large Complex Case List,” aimed at more efficiently managing cases where a minimum of $50 million is at issue, is to be formed in the Manhattan Supreme Court's Commercial Division as a pilot program, according to a court administration order.
The program, set to begin Jan. 1, comes after the Commercial Division Advisory Council proposed the idea for a high-stakes case list earlier this year. The council has said that the case list will help make clear that “the London Commercial Court is not entitled to a monopoly on large lawsuits.”
In 2015, the U.K. court instituted its “Financial List,” a separate docket of financial cases worth at least 50 million pounds ($65.2 million). The Large Complex Case List is viewed by council members as a way to more ardently compete for high-stakes litigations while improving the operations and speed of an overtaxed state court system.
According to a report prepared by a council subcommittee, large “complex” cases would benefit from procedures and tools that facilitate a quicker resolution. Dedicated resources would include special referees with expertise in discovery such as that of federal court magistrate judges, backup settlement judges and special mediators, and technology that streamlines the exchange of documents and active case management.
The court administration order, signed by Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks on Oct. 23 and approved by the Administrative Board after public comment, states in part that Manhattan Commercial Division justices “may designate a case for the List, either sua sponte or upon application by a party, if it (i) addresses commercial claims for an amount no less than $50 million (exclusive of punitive damages, interest, costs, disbursements, and counsel fees); or (ii) addresses matters of sufficient complexity and importance to warrant such designation.”
It adds that “justices presiding over such cases may, in their discretion, apply procedures and make available to the parties such court resources as may be available (including but not limited to special referees with expertise in discovery, special mediators, settlement judges, interface options with extranets and electronic document depositories, and hyperlinked briefs) commensurate with the requirements of active case management of the largest and most complex matters in the Commercial Division.”
David Tennant, a Rochester-based
He added that the program doesn't have an end date, and that court administration will be evaluating the program and considering next steps.
“The advisory council will be interested in seeing how it plays out in the real world,” as well, he said. “There is a belief that there are a substantial number of cases that will meet the threshold.”
The council's subcommittee report said the U.K. court's financial list is “clearly designed by the U.K. courts to promote London as the premier jurisdiction for resolution of commercial disputes, both to benefit the English judiciary and bar and to enhance the attractiveness of London as a global financial center.”
It added, “We believe it is in the best interest of the Commercial Division, the
Jeff Storey contributed reporting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250