Injury, Labor Firms Among Funders Opposing Constitutional Convention
New Yorkers Against Corruption, a campaign opposing the constitutional convention mainly funded by labor unions, also has received contributions from the legal community, a review of campaign contributions by the New York Law Journal found.
November 01, 2017 at 02:11 PM
11 minute read
New York Legislature.
ALBANY – While labor unions, environmentalists, liberal and conservative groups have banded together to oppose opening up the state constitution to revisions, several personal injury and labor law firms also have helped fund a campaign against holding a constitutional convention, records show.
New Yorkers Against Corruption, a campaign opposing the constitutional convention mainly funded by labor unions, also has received contributions from the legal community, a review of campaign contributions by the New York Law Journal found.
On Nov. 7, voters will have a chance to decide on the referendum question “Shall there be a convention to revise the constitution and amend the same?” The question is posed every 20 years to voters, which last rejected the proposal in 1997. If the referendum is approved, voters in New York would elect delegates in 2018 to a convention, which would meet the year after. At the convention, delegates would get to propose amendments to the state constitution for voter ratification. Then, in November 2019, the electorate would get a chance to vote on each proposed amendment.
Proponents of holding a constitutional convention, including the New York State Bar Association, have said that it provides a unique opportunity to reorganize the state's court system and to address several issues that the Legislature hasn't, such as reforms to campaign finance law. The state constitution was last revised in 1967, when the last constitutional convention was held.
The Committee for a Constitutional Convention, managed by Evan Davis, who is senior counsel at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton and the former counsel to Gov. Mario Cuomo, has received contributions from individual attorneys, but the campaign apparatus significantly lags behind New Yorkers Against Corruption.
Opponents of a constitutional convention argue that opening up the state constitution for revisions and change could be influenced by outside “dark money” and similar donors that aided in the election of President Donald Trump. Opponents have also argued that several provisions already existing in the state constitution could be threatened, if not entirely undone.
Opponents, including Newburgh-based Fine, Olin & Anderman, which serves the “legal needs of union members” donated $12,500 to the campaign in early October, campaign disclosures with the state's Board of Elections show. Also among the law firms who contributed the most to defeat the ballot measure are Kennedy, Jennik & Murray, which represents unions and employees, who donated $5,000 last week; Weitz & Luxenberg, a personal injury litigation firm; Colleran, O'Hara & Mills, a labor law firm; and Levy Ratner, a labor advocacy law firm, which each donated $2,500 to New Yorkers Against Corruption last month, disclosures show.
Various personal injury and labor law firms also contributed roughly $41,100 since New Yorkers Against Corruption became politically active in the summer, campaign contribution records show. But the contributions by the law firms pale in comparison to the ones donated by labor unions, which have given hundreds of thousands of dollars in the days leading up to next week's election.
Tom Kennedy, a partner at Kennedy, Jennik & Murray, told the New York Law Journal Tuesday that the law firm believes holding a constitutional convention “would be dominated by right- wing billionaires and their cohorts in an effort to destroy hard-won rights.” The pension system for public employees would “be under assault” and collective bargaining could be removed, Kennedy said.
The Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York also has voted to oppose the convention, which would be the first in 50 years. The next referendum on a convention would be in 2037.
Voters also appear to be against holding a constitutional convention. A poll of likely voters released by Siena College Research Institute in Albany Wednesday morning found that only 25 percent of likely voters support holding a constitutional convention, while 57 percent of likely voters in New York oppose it.
“While a small plurality of likely New York City voters opposes ConCon, strong majorities of downstate suburbanites and upstate voters oppose it,” said Siena spokesman Steve Greenberg. “Democrats and independents oppose ConCon by about 2-to-1, while Republicans oppose it better than 3-to-1.”
ALBANY – While labor unions, environmentalists, liberal and conservative groups have banded together to oppose opening up the state constitution to revisions, several personal injury and labor law firms also have helped fund a campaign against holding a constitutional convention, records show.
New Yorkers Against Corruption, a campaign opposing the constitutional convention mainly funded by labor unions, also has received contributions from the legal community, a review of campaign contributions by the
On Nov. 7, voters will have a chance to decide on the referendum question “Shall there be a convention to revise the constitution and amend the same?” The question is posed every 20 years to voters, which last rejected the proposal in 1997. If the referendum is approved, voters in
Proponents of holding a constitutional convention, including the
The Committee for a Constitutional Convention, managed by Evan Davis, who is senior counsel at
Opponents of a constitutional convention argue that opening up the state constitution for revisions and change could be influenced by outside “dark money” and similar donors that aided in the election of President Donald Trump. Opponents have also argued that several provisions already existing in the state constitution could be threatened, if not entirely undone.
Opponents, including Newburgh-based Fine, Olin & Anderman, which serves the “legal needs of union members” donated $12,500 to the campaign in early October, campaign disclosures with the state's Board of Elections show. Also among the law firms who contributed the most to defeat the ballot measure are Kennedy, Jennik & Murray, which represents unions and employees, who donated $5,000 last week;
Various personal injury and labor law firms also contributed roughly $41,100 since New Yorkers Against Corruption became politically active in the summer, campaign contribution records show. But the contributions by the law firms pale in comparison to the ones donated by labor unions, which have given hundreds of thousands of dollars in the days leading up to next week's election.
Tom Kennedy, a partner at Kennedy, Jennik & Murray, told the
The Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of
Voters also appear to be against holding a constitutional convention. A poll of likely voters released by Siena College Research Institute in Albany Wednesday morning found that only 25 percent of likely voters support holding a constitutional convention, while 57 percent of likely voters in
“While a small plurality of likely
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System's Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission Presents Annual Diversity Awards
Appealability of Prejudgment Orders: CPLR 5512, Court of Appeals, Legislative Intent
10 minute readFederal Court That Faces Its Share of Real-Life Horrors Gets Into Halloween Spirit
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250