New York Gets Middling Marks in New National Pretrial Detention Survey
The report from the Pretrial Justice Institute highlighted the state of pretrial policies across the country.
November 01, 2017 at 12:01 AM
4 minute read
New York barely squeaked by with a passing grade in an inaugural survey of pretrial services across the country.
The report, “The State of Pretrial Justice in America,” is an attempt by the Pretrial Justice Institute to chart and track the progress of pretrial improvement efforts year-over-year, according to Cherise Fanno Burdeen, the institute's CEO.
A “C” may not be a sterling rating, but Burdeen said it was a mark above the “dismal” national average of “D.”
Burdeen noted that pretrial detention remains where most people who are locked up are serving time, and that the vast majority of those people are in on misdemeanors and will be sentenced to time served or probation.
“Most people are being held in jail because they're too poor to post a money bond,” she said. “These are not rapist, murderers and arsonists. These are people charged with low-level, nonviolent, non-person for the most part misdemeanor charges.”
According to the report, New York scored best in the incarceration rate category, earning two points. Half the total possible points of four were also earned for the use of validated pretrial assessments across the state. However, New York's continued use of money bail earned it zero points, while the “bonus point” possible for widespread use of pretrial assessments and the elimination of money bail left the state with a total of three points, bringing it to the lower end of the “C” range.
Burdeen said the state's biggest issue—and one she said the institute advocates for changing—is the inability of judges to consider the dangerousness of a defendant in setting bail.
“We're fairly certain judges across the state are thinking about whether or not the person in front of them is likely to get in trouble or cause trouble prior to trial, and yet there's no legal way to detain them for that, and there's certainly no legal way to appeal if you think a judge's considering that,” Burdeen said.
She pointed across the Hudson River, where New Jersey judges do explicitly take public safety into account.
“In those hearings, just like in D.C., about half the time the state is unable to make the case, and the courts are releasing,” Burdeen said, adding that New Jersey's detention rate was down to 10 percent, while D.C.'s was down to 5 percent.
Some in the defense bar have raised concerns over changing what judges are allowed to consider when assessing bail, especially absent reforms to the use of cash bail, as a path to more punitive bail measures. Burdeen said the concerns aren't being realized elsewhere.
“It really kind of counters this claim that, if you provide the courts with a legal means of detention, they'll somehow abuse it—as if to say they're not abusing that today by serving money bonds,” she said.
Burdeen also argued for a wider use of assessment tools during the bail process, which she said, when used as to help guide discretion using “objective bumpers in the lane,” ultimately gives defendants a better shot at being released. She pointed to a letter released in May from a host of national public defender organizations, including the National Legal Aid and Defender Association and the National Association for Public Defense, that supported the use of pretrial risk assessments in helping to determine bail.
“You're seeing a large perception of people, in particular people who would have been detained on money bond, being released non-financially,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250