'Day Trader' Indicted in Brokerage Account Hack-and-Trade Scheme
A self-described day trader was indicted Wednesday on allegations he conspired to hack into online brokers accounts to conduct coordinated trades that…
November 08, 2017 at 06:42 PM
2 minute read
A self-described day trader was indicted Wednesday on allegations he conspired to hack into online brokers accounts to conduct coordinated trades that cost the affected firms more than $2 million, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York.
Joseph Willner was indicted on four counts, including conspiracy to commit wire fraud and securities fraud, for his alleged part in the trade hacks. Prosecutors say that between September 2014 and May 2017, Willner and alleged co-conspirators gained access to more than 50 online brokerage accounts. Willner would make stock short sales at inflated prices, according to prosecutors. At the same time, they say, Willner's co-conspirators, who gained access over victims' brokerage accounts, placed orders to buy the stocks at the artificially high prices.
Prosecutors allege that Willner and his co-conspirators repurchased the stock from the victims at market rate or below, netting a profit for the alleged conspirators. Willner then allegedly laundered the proceeds through bitcoin.
“Cybercriminals continue to come up with innovative ways to steal money from victims using the Internet, as in this case where defendant Willner's co-conspirators allegedly hacked into the victims' accounts in order to execute fraudulent short sales,” acting U.S. Attorney Bridget Rohde said in a statement. “Regardless of what innovative ways fraudsters come up with, this Office, together with our law enforcement partners, will prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.”
According to prosecutors, the conspirators discussed their scheme in Twitter direct messages, with one conspirator stating, “legal trading too hard.” Willner allegedly responded that he would be a “good trading partner.”
Michael Engle, the Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young white-collar practice chairman, and associate Ashley Shapiro previously represented Willner. In an email Wednesday, the pair indicated they were no longer representing him. New counsel could not be identified.
The case, United States v. Willner, 17-mj-00527, has been assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250