Prosecutors Seeking to Enforce $5.9M Judgment Against Firm Tied to Russian Treasury Fraud
The $5.9 million settlement that the U.S. government reached in May with a firm allegedly tied with a massive $230 million heist from the Russian Treasury may hang in the balance as the government moves to enforce the agreement.
November 09, 2017 at 07:09 PM
8 minute read
The $5.9 million settlement that the U.S. government reached in May with a firm allegedly tied with a massive $230 million heist from the Russian Treasury may hang in the balance as the government moves to enforce the agreement.
Prevezon, which had been accused of taking $1.9 million from the treasury scheme, argues that it is not able to pay the settlement because the assets it intends to use to pay up are being held by the Dutch government.
“Our bills have not been paid because our assets have been frozen,” said Faith Gay, a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and a member of Prevezon's U.S.-based defense team, at a conference on Thursday evening before U.S. District Judge William Pauley III of the Southern District of New York.
Prevezon says the Netherlands is holding on to its funds because of a money laundering complaint filed by Hermitage Capital; William Browder, who founded Hermitage, also “instigated” the civil forfeiture case against Prevezon in the Southern District, according to court papers.
About $582,000 of the money defrauded from the treasury is allegedly invested in high-end property in Manhattan's Financial District.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Monteleoni of the Southern District told Pauley that Prevezon knew it was accepting the risk of being obligated to pay the settlement by entering into the agreement, but Gay said the risk fell onto the shoulders of the government.
Depending on how the government argues for an enforcement of the judgment, Gay said, her client may consider countering against the government with a claim of “breach of good faith and fair dealing.”
Monteleoni said the government would brief its motion to enforce the judgment within the next week.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Cristine Phillips and Tara La Morte are also prosecuting the case.
The $5.9 million settlement that the U.S. government reached in May with a firm allegedly tied with a massive $230 million heist from the Russian Treasury may hang in the balance as the government moves to enforce the agreement.
Prevezon, which had been accused of taking $1.9 million from the treasury scheme, argues that it is not able to pay the settlement because the assets it intends to use to pay up are being held by the Dutch government.
“Our bills have not been paid because our assets have been frozen,” said Faith Gay, a partner at
Prevezon says the
About $582,000 of the money defrauded from the treasury is allegedly invested in high-end property in Manhattan's Financial District.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Monteleoni of the Southern District told Pauley that Prevezon knew it was accepting the risk of being obligated to pay the settlement by entering into the agreement, but Gay said the risk fell onto the shoulders of the government.
Depending on how the government argues for an enforcement of the judgment, Gay said, her client may consider countering against the government with a claim of “breach of good faith and fair dealing.”
Monteleoni said the government would brief its motion to enforce the judgment within the next week.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Cristine Phillips and Tara La Morte are also prosecuting the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute readGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readJudge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250