Jury Awards $2.2M to Family of Mentally Ill Man Killed by Police
A federal jury in Manhattan awarded on Tuesday a $2.2 million verdict to the family of a mentally disturbed man who was shot and killed in his home by New York City police officers in 2012.
November 14, 2017 at 06:28 PM
4 minute read
A federal jury in Manhattan awarded on Tuesday a $2.2 million verdict to the family of a mentally disturbed man who was shot and killed in his home by New York City police officers in 2012.
The jury of five men and five women awarded compensatory damages to the estate of Mohamed Bah, who was shot eight times by three NYPD officers who responded to a 911 call from his mother asking for assistance to take her son to a hospital because he was suffering a mental health crisis.
The jury, sitting in the Southern District of New York, found New York City detective Edwin Mateo liable for excessive use of force and Mateo's supervisor, Lt. Michael Licitra, liable for failing to properly supervise Mateo.
The Bah estate was represented by Randolph McLaughlin and Debra Cohen of Newman Ferrara.
In an interview, McLaughlin said he felt the jury was won over by the fact that Mateo told officers at the scene of the shooting that Bah was stabbing him, but said in a deposition for the civil rights case that he was not being stabbed.
McLaughlin said the jury was further convinced by testimony from a pathologist who said Bah was shot in the head in a downward direction, and thus it was likely that Bah was lying on the ground when the shot was fired.
“We think those two issues were fatal to Mateo's situation,” McLaughlin said.
Nicholas Paolucci, a spokesman for the city's Law Department, said in an emailed statement that the department disagrees with the jury's verdict and that it would “take whatever legal steps are necessary” to have the verdict reviewed.
“Our view is that all of the officers involved responded appropriately under the circumstances,” Paolucci said. “While this incident ended tragically, we believe these officers strictly adhered to established protocols for dealing with emotionally disturbed persons. Ultimately, they were required to make a split-second decision to use lethal force.”
A federal jury in Manhattan awarded on Tuesday a $2.2 million verdict to the family of a mentally disturbed man who was shot and killed in his home by
The jury of five men and five women awarded compensatory damages to the estate of Mohamed Bah, who was shot eight times by three NYPD officers who responded to a 911 call from his mother asking for assistance to take her son to a hospital because he was suffering a mental health crisis.
The jury, sitting in the Southern District of
The Bah estate was represented by Randolph McLaughlin and Debra Cohen of Newman Ferrara.
In an interview, McLaughlin said he felt the jury was won over by the fact that Mateo told officers at the scene of the shooting that Bah was stabbing him, but said in a deposition for the civil rights case that he was not being stabbed.
McLaughlin said the jury was further convinced by testimony from a pathologist who said Bah was shot in the head in a downward direction, and thus it was likely that Bah was lying on the ground when the shot was fired.
“We think those two issues were fatal to Mateo's situation,” McLaughlin said.
Nicholas Paolucci, a spokesman for the city's Law Department, said in an emailed statement that the department disagrees with the jury's verdict and that it would “take whatever legal steps are necessary” to have the verdict reviewed.
“Our view is that all of the officers involved responded appropriately under the circumstances,” Paolucci said. “While this incident ended tragically, we believe these officers strictly adhered to established protocols for dealing with emotionally disturbed persons. Ultimately, they were required to make a split-second decision to use lethal force.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Lateral Partner Moves Spike, Especially in PE and Funds Practices
NY Judge Admonished for Writing Recommendation Letters for Pistol Licenses
Law Firms, Legal Research Companies Collaborate With Vals AI on Gen AI Benchmarking Study
Skadden Lures Paul Weiss Marketing Pro Luke Ferrandino as Longtime CMO Retires
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250