Government Witness Cross-Examined About Bribe Allegations at FIFA Trial
A government witness at the U.S. trial of three former South American soccer officials was cross-examined on Thursday about allegations he bribed the defendants, while a judge reviewed claims that one defendant made a slashing motion across his neck in a way meant to intimidate the witness.
November 16, 2017 at 04:05 PM
5 minute read
FIFA flags at the entrance to the head office in Zurich. Photo credit: Ugis Riba/Shutterstock.com.
A government witness at the U.S. trial of three former South American soccer officials was cross-examined on Thursday about allegations he bribed the defendants, while a judge reviewed claims that one defendant made a slashing motion across his neck in a way meant to intimidate the witness.
A lawyer for Juan Angel Napout, the ex-president of Paraguay's soccer federation, pressed Alejandro Burzaco on Thursday about whether he personally paid any bribes to Napout in a scheme that has scandalized FIFA, the sport's governing body.
Burzaco, a former marketing executive from Argentina testifying under a plea deal, told jurors in federal court in Brooklyn that he “personally never gave Napout cash in his hands.” Instead, millions of dollars in bribes from his company were channeled through various off-the-books business entities before reaching Napout, he testified.
The defendant “receives the money,” he said. “He's happy.”
Napout, Manuel Burga, of Peru, and Jose Maria Marin, of Brazil, have pleaded not guilty to charges they enriched themselves in a 24-year international conspiracy involving $150 million in bribes in exchange for lucrative broadcasting and hosting rights for soccer tournaments. More than 40 defendants have been charged in the sprawling corruption case, with many, including Burzaco, pleading guilty in hopes of getting reduced sentences.
During three days on the witness stand, Burzaco testified that his firm gave bribes totaling $4.5 million to Napout, $3.6 million to Burga and $2.7 million to Marin. He also claimed he has been the subject of death threats in Argentina because of his cooperation against powerful soccer officials.
U.S. District Judge Pamela Chen of the Eastern District of New York has been scrutinizing courtroom security videotape that prosecutors say backs up their claim that Burga made a threatening gesture Wednesday while staring at Burzaco. The defense said Burga was merely scratching his neck.
“This is a gentle, meek, timid man,” Burga's attorney, Bruce Udolf, said during a conference without the jury in the courtroom. “I never saw any indication that he was making any gesture.”
For now, the judge has stopped short of locking up Burga as prosecutors wanted, instead tightening bail conditions by placing him under house arrest at a residence in Brooklyn. Burga already had been on GPS monitoring but had some privileges to leave the home.
FIFA flags at the entrance to the head office in Zurich. Photo credit: Ugis Riba/Shutterstock.com.
A government witness at the U.S. trial of three former South American soccer officials was cross-examined on Thursday about allegations he bribed the defendants, while a judge reviewed claims that one defendant made a slashing motion across his neck in a way meant to intimidate the witness.
A lawyer for Juan Angel Napout, the ex-president of Paraguay's soccer federation, pressed Alejandro Burzaco on Thursday about whether he personally paid any bribes to Napout in a scheme that has scandalized FIFA, the sport's governing body.
Burzaco, a former marketing executive from Argentina testifying under a plea deal, told jurors in federal court in Brooklyn that he “personally never gave Napout cash in his hands.” Instead, millions of dollars in bribes from his company were channeled through various off-the-books business entities before reaching Napout, he testified.
The defendant “receives the money,” he said. “He's happy.”
Napout, Manuel Burga, of Peru, and Jose Maria Marin, of Brazil, have pleaded not guilty to charges they enriched themselves in a 24-year international conspiracy involving $150 million in bribes in exchange for lucrative broadcasting and hosting rights for soccer tournaments. More than 40 defendants have been charged in the sprawling corruption case, with many, including Burzaco, pleading guilty in hopes of getting reduced sentences.
During three days on the witness stand, Burzaco testified that his firm gave bribes totaling $4.5 million to Napout, $3.6 million to Burga and $2.7 million to Marin. He also claimed he has been the subject of death threats in Argentina because of his cooperation against powerful soccer officials.
U.S. District Judge Pamela Chen of the Eastern District of
“This is a gentle, meek, timid man,” Burga's attorney, Bruce Udolf, said during a conference without the jury in the courtroom. “I never saw any indication that he was making any gesture.”
For now, the judge has stopped short of locking up Burga as prosecutors wanted, instead tightening bail conditions by placing him under house arrest at a residence in Brooklyn. Burga already had been on GPS monitoring but had some privileges to leave the home.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250