Assembly Judiciary Committee Head Dinowitz Lays Out Priorities
Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz, a Bronx Democrat who is the new head of the Assembly Judiciary Committee, said in an interview that he's “concerned” that there aren't enough judges in the five boroughs, a matter that he hopes to address in legislation.
November 17, 2017 at 02:22 PM
4 minute read
ALBANY – Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz, the recently named head of the Assembly's Judiciary Committee, isn't “looking to reinvent the wheel” as the committee chairman, but he's examining changes to the judiciary.
Related Story: NY Wants to Reform State's Byzantine Court System Despite Constitutional Convention Defeat
In an interview with the New York Law Journal on Friday, the Bronx Democrat said he's “concerned” that there aren't enough judges in the five boroughs, something that he hopes to address as the head of the judiciary committee, which has jurisdiction over any legislation that may affect New York courts.
The state constitution allows the Legislature to increase the number of justices of the state Supreme Court, subject to a cap of one justice per 50,000 people. Under that formula, the Bronx would be entitled to three more judges, and “boy do we need it in the Bronx,” Dinowitz said.
“I'm not saying that every [judicial] district get up to that number. Some have lighter caseloads. But certainly within the boroughs of the city. There are huge backlogs. We need more judges,” Dinowitz said during a phone interview.
“We really have to start talking about putting money in the judiciary in the amount that are appropriate to dispense justice and be fair,” Dinowitz said. “The judicial budget has been kind of flat in recent years … If we want to have the best possible justice system, then it doesn't come free. There's always room to make things more efficient. But we have to pay to make sure we have enough judges, court officers and buildings that are decent.”
Adding more judges would mean increasing the state's judicial budget, which has largely abided by Gov. Andrew Cuomo's 2 percent spending growth limit for state agencies. Increasing the judiciary's budget beyond 2 percent could be further complicated by the fact that the state is already facing a $4 billion budget deficit and federal funding cuts.
In September, Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie announced that Dinowitz, a graduate of Brooklyn Law School and a former administrative judge, would take over the position of head of the judiciary committee, succeeding Assemblywoman Helene Weinstein of Brooklyn. Weinstein, the first woman to hold the position of chair of the judiciary committee when she was appointed in 1994, was elevated to the powerful position of chair of the Ways and Means Committee, which is responsible for all matters pertaining to the adoption of the state budget after Assemblyman Herman “Denny” Farrell of Manhattan retired after 42 years as a lawmaker.
Dinowitz, who has been part of the judiciary committee for roughly 20 years, said despite his long tenure on the committee “there's a steep learning curve.”
“I'm not looking to necessarily do things differently than Helene,” he said. “She did a great job. I'm not looking to reinvent the wheel.”
Following in Weinstein's footsteps of increasing funding for civil legal services, Dinowitz said it's also “top priority” for him.
“Housing Court is the busiest court in the Bronx. We have to make sure they run efficiently and fairly,” he said.
In August, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed legislation into law providing all low-income tenants facing eviction with legal representation in Housing Court, something that should be implemented statewide, Dinowitz said.
“That should be how it is all over the place. We want to prevent homelessness and one way to do it is treating tenants fairly in housing courts,” he said, adding that he'd also like to make a push to make the judiciary more diverse.
“People have to feel that the judiciary has to represent everybody,” Dinowitz added. “I think that's an important issue … I don't know if it's something the committee can actually do something about. But all of these things are important. We want a fair judicial system.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250