American Dream or New York State-Created Nightmare?
The consumer (and voter) needs to have a more objective view of why closing expenses are so high. Is it because of the title insurance companies gouging their customers for services needed and provided? Or, is it because of a plethora of NYS taxes and excessive fees that add thousands of dollars to each real estate transaction?
November 17, 2017 at 02:57 PM
3 minute read
I am an attorney admitted to the NYS Bar since 1978 and have actively managed two different title insurance abstract companies for over a combined 25 years.
My letter is intended to advise your readers (one of whom I hope is our Governor) of the imminent implementation of two (2) new regulations prepared by the DFS; an administrative arm of the State government that is mandated to champion our citizen's rights and to protect consumers from unscrupulous practices by entities operating within our borders.
These specific “protections” are intended to rein in the Title Insurance Underwriters licensed by NYS Insurance Department and their many Agents (of which I am one). They reduce the rates to be charged for title insurance policies; they eliminate the entertaining of business clients by underwriters and agents; they limit fees to be charged for mandated services provided; and they eliminate the acceptance of gratuities that have historically been given at closings to the title company representatives (title closers) by satisfied consumers.
At first blush, this is a noble exercise—and to be commended. After all, title closings are VERY expensive, touch so many of our citizens (and VOTERS), and impact directly on the basic American dream of acquiring a home.
What's my gripe? Is it just sour grapes? Am I merely a greedy businessman preying on overburdened home buyers?
Let's consider a few things about closings. First, there's the mortgage tax. 1% of the amount you're borrowing goes to NYS (in NYC, over 2%) for the privilege of going into debt. I'm unaware of any other state in our country that assesses any mortgage tax at all.
Then there's the 1% “Mansion Tax” that applies to all home purchases of over $1 million dollars (a tax we all have paid since Governor Cuomo's father, Mario, first dreamt it up in 1989).
Lastly, there are the recording fees charged by the various county clerks. These fees have literally doubled (and in some cases, tripled) within the last year. Why, you ask? So-called document verification surcharges of $300 per document can add an additional $900 (or more) to a typical home re-finance bill. The consumer is paying double (or more) to ensure the bank documents recorded are affecting the correct property. Isn't that what the original recording fee is for?
By the way, Nassau County has advised their fees will increase AGAIN come January 2018. Can Suffolk be far behind?
I guess my point is that the consumer (and voter) needs to have a more objective view of why closing expenses are so high. Is it because of the title insurance companies gouging their customers for services needed and provided? Or, is it because of a plethora of NYS taxes and excessive fees that add thousands of dollars to each real estate transaction?
Maybe the DFS should inspect its own house before laying the blame on the title industry—again.
Steven Bodziner
Vice President & Manager,
Bridgehampton National Bank
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepealing Fault Grounds for Divorce Would Have Little Effect on NY Matrimonial Law
11 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250