Libby Harrison, Unheralded Legal Scholar and Unsung Hero
On November 1, 2017, Albany attorney Lisabeth—Libby—Harrison died at the age of 69. Most members of the New York bench and bar do not recognize Libby's name. Given her substantial contributions to New York law, that is both unfortunate and unjust.
November 21, 2017 at 03:36 PM
8 minute read
On November 1, 2017, Albany attorney Lisabeth—Libby—Harrison died at the age of 69. Most members of the New York bench and bar do not recognize Libby's name. Given her substantial contributions to New York law, that is both unfortunate and unjust. In fairness to her dedication and fidelity to the law, and her many efforts to improve it, a review of Libby's career is warranted.
After graduating magna cum laude from the State University of New York at Stony Brook, Libby attended St. John's University Law School. She enjoyed significant success in Queens: Libby was the editor of the law review and graduated magna cum laude. After law school, Libby spent 15 years as a law clerk to two New York State Court of Appeals Judges—Hon. Dominic L. Gabrielli and Hon. Vito J. Titone. Her clerkships were followed by tours with the Appellate Division, Third Department; the New York State Capital Defenders Office; and the Appeals Bureau of the Legal Aid Society. As those positions demonstrate, her commitment to justice was manifest. Libby then transitioned from the public to the private sector, practicing law with the firm of Mintz & Gold, LLP. She would remain with the firm for the remainder of her career.
Libby enjoyed a well-earned reputation as a first-rate legal talent: exceedingly intelligent, hardworking, reliable and successful. Thus, Libby could have been content with (and proud of) the resume she amassed. She could have focused exclusively on the practice of law in the Capital District and eschewed other professional undertakings. But she did not.
In 2003, Libby joined the Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, Civil, of the Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, the Committee charged with maintaining the PJI treatise. The Committee is made up of a select group of Supreme Court Justices—some trial judges, some Appellate Division judges—and two (sometimes three) “reporters.” The reporters, who are not judges, review developments in the law and suggest changes to the treatise based on those developments. Also, the reporters revise individual sections of the treatise. The proposed changes and revisions are reviewed by the judicial members of the Committee. That review is thorough and substantial, and requires close interaction among the judicial members of the Committee and the reporters. The Committee works throughout the year, meeting approximately nine times. Its efforts are reflected in the five-volume PJI treatise that is published every December.
For the better part of 15 years, Libby was a stalwart steward of the PJI treatise, effecting thousands of changes to the charges and comments—all while maintaining her law practice. She added new authority to the comments, reformed and polished existing text, and created new sections of “the books.” (This year alone, Libby, among other things, substantially revised the negligent misrepresentation section and created a section for right of privacy.) Libby worked to improve all four substantive volumes (volumes 1A, 1B, 2A and 2B). Her unmatched efforts and dedication to the committee made an excellent publication even better. Simply put, no individual did more over the past 15 years than Libby to make the PJI treatise the authoritative work it is.
Given the importance of the PJI treatise to the New York bench and bar, and the considerable and unrivaled contributions Libby made to the publication for a decade and a half, it is clear that Libby had a sizable impact on New York law. It is clearer still that judges and lawyers will benefit for years to come from Libby's industry, as her words and wisdom are ingrained in the treatise.
Hon. David Demarest, J.S.C. (ret.), Chair of the PJI Committee;
Hon. Leon D. Lazer, J.S.C. (ret.), Chair Emeritus of the PJI Committee;
and John R. Higgitt, reporter to the PJI Committee
On November 1, 2017, Albany attorney Lisabeth—Libby—Harrison died at the age of 69. Most members of the
After graduating magna cum laude from the State University of
Libby enjoyed a well-earned reputation as a first-rate legal talent: exceedingly intelligent, hardworking, reliable and successful. Thus, Libby could have been content with (and proud of) the resume she amassed. She could have focused exclusively on the practice of law in the Capital District and eschewed other professional undertakings. But she did not.
In 2003, Libby joined the Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, Civil, of the Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of
For the better part of 15 years, Libby was a stalwart steward of the PJI treatise, effecting thousands of changes to the charges and comments—all while maintaining her law practice. She added new authority to the comments, reformed and polished existing text, and created new sections of “the books.” (This year alone, Libby, among other things, substantially revised the negligent misrepresentation section and created a section for right of privacy.) Libby worked to improve all four substantive volumes (volumes 1A, 1B, 2A and 2B). Her unmatched efforts and dedication to the committee made an excellent publication even better. Simply put, no individual did more over the past 15 years than Libby to make the PJI treatise the authoritative work it is.
Given the importance of the PJI treatise to the
Hon. David Demarest, J.S.C. (ret.), Chair of the PJI Committee;
Hon. Leon D. Lazer, J.S.C. (ret.), Chair Emeritus of the PJI Committee;
and John R. Higgitt, reporter to the PJI Committee
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 2Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 3Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 4UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 5Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250