Artificial Intelligence and Constitutional Law
The STAR-SKAN algorithms can resolve the knottiest legal questions in seconds—almost as fast as Donald Trump can tweet the answer.
November 28, 2017 at 02:00 PM
9 minute read
A new app funded by conservative interest groups has the potential to streamline our justice system. This app, the Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Roberts, Sometimes Kennedy and Now We've Got Neil Gorsuch Know-It-All System, or STAR-SKAN, uses artificial intelligence to distill the views of present and former Republican appointees to the Supreme Court into a handful of algorithms that can be uploaded and stored forever on a computer or iPhone and used to decide any issue touching on constitutional law. No more need for cases to wend their way through the lower courts to focus on specific actions and their effects. No more waiting months for briefing, argument and deliberations in the Supreme Court. The STAR-SKAN algorithms can resolve the knottiest legal questions in seconds—almost as fast as Donald Trump can tweet the answer. As a virtual, rather than flesh-and-blood, Justice, with artificial rather than emotional intelligence, STAR-SKAN avoids the vagaries of individual life events and will preserve the legacy of conservative Justices going all the way back to Roger Taney more reliably than any living Justice could.
Let's get started with simple and straightforward Algorithm 1: Tap the icon titled Citizens United. Up comes the answer: “Money Talks.” And so it is, no matter what Elena Kagan or Sonia Sotomayor may say. People with lots of money may influence elections and elected officials all they want. People without money must make up for it by travelling many miles in cars they don't own to purchase identification cards they can't afford simply in order to vote.
Now, to prove the elegance of STAR-SKAN, ask yourself who can best pay for speech? That's right: Not Ruth Bader Ginsburg or even Steven Breyer but giant, for-profit corporations formed for commercial purposes. And that brings us to STAR-SKAN Algorithm 2 (accessed through the icon Hobby Lobby). Corporations are artificial entities created for convenience. They have no actual mouths, larynxes or brains. But the rules of STAR-SKAN give them rights to speak and exercise religious beliefs that supersede the rights of actual people who do have physical organs. Indeed, physical organs of real people can be harmed when artificial beings exercise these artificial rights.
These first two algorithms are often employed in conjunction with the powerful STAR-SKAN Algorithm 3 of originalism for constitutional analysis. Just click on the “Originalism” button to answer every question. Then let the system use as much originality as it chooses in opining about how a white male slave owner would have dealt with a situation he never dreamed would have existed over two centuries ago.
The “originalism” algorithm can be used as a short cut for all voting and civil rights questions. Plug in Siri or Alexa under the icon that looks like the emancipation proclamation with an X drawn through it. She will tell you not only to turn right at every intersection but also to ignore everything that has happened since the adoption of the Constitution in its original form. This includes the 13th and 14th Amendments to the constitution, the statutes enacted pursuant to those amendments, and the bloody civil war that our country fought to outlaw badges of slavery. STAR-SKAN has already established that money talks; originalism confirms that those most disadvantaged by our nation's history should be expected to face barriers to exercising voting and other rights not originally intended for them. “Q.E.D.”, concludes Siri—if Congress funds the add-on for spicing up computer generated opinions with Latin and out of context quotes from ancient documents.
Finally, STAR-SKAN Algorithm 4: The fundamental notion of habeas corpus. This Latin phrase is translated by STAR-SKAN to mean you already have the person's body, so you might as well keep it—and by the way there is probably not much you will do to it that we will find to be cruel and unusual.
STAR-SKAN will keep a narrow, conservative ideology ascendant no matter who wins future elections, remove judicial appointments from politics and public oversight, and take the unpredictable discretion and independence of judges out of the courts and our system of justice once and for all. Demand that your Congressman vote to install STAR-SKAN now. Or tweet our President and ask him to have the workers at Mar-a-Lago install it before he deports them. We already have drones for some governmental functions and computerized tools for many others. The time is ripe for automating judicial dogmatism as well.
James B. Kobak Jr. is senior ethics counsel in New York.
A new app funded by conservative interest groups has the potential to streamline our justice system. This app, the Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Roberts, Sometimes Kennedy and Now We've Got Neil Gorsuch Know-It-All System, or STAR-SKAN, uses artificial intelligence to distill the views of present and former Republican appointees to the Supreme Court into a handful of algorithms that can be uploaded and stored forever on a computer or iPhone and used to decide any issue touching on constitutional law. No more need for cases to wend their way through the lower courts to focus on specific actions and their effects. No more waiting months for briefing, argument and deliberations in the Supreme Court. The STAR-SKAN algorithms can resolve the knottiest legal questions in seconds—almost as fast as Donald Trump can tweet the answer. As a virtual, rather than flesh-and-blood, Justice, with artificial rather than emotional intelligence, STAR-SKAN avoids the vagaries of individual life events and will preserve the legacy of conservative Justices going all the way back to Roger Taney more reliably than any living Justice could.
Let's get started with simple and straightforward Algorithm 1: Tap the icon titled Citizens United. Up comes the answer: “Money Talks.” And so it is, no matter what
Now, to prove the elegance of STAR-SKAN, ask yourself who can best pay for speech? That's right: Not
These first two algorithms are often employed in conjunction with the powerful STAR-SKAN Algorithm 3 of originalism for constitutional analysis. Just click on the “Originalism” button to answer every question. Then let the system use as much originality as it chooses in opining about how a white male slave owner would have dealt with a situation he never dreamed would have existed over two centuries ago.
The “originalism” algorithm can be used as a short cut for all voting and civil rights questions. Plug in Siri or Alexa under the icon that looks like the emancipation proclamation with an X drawn through it. She will tell you not only to turn right at every intersection but also to ignore everything that has happened since the adoption of the Constitution in its original form. This includes the 13th and 14th Amendments to the constitution, the statutes enacted pursuant to those amendments, and the bloody civil war that our country fought to outlaw badges of slavery. STAR-SKAN has already established that money talks; originalism confirms that those most disadvantaged by our nation's history should be expected to face barriers to exercising voting and other rights not originally intended for them. “Q.E.D.”, concludes Siri—if Congress funds the add-on for spicing up computer generated opinions with Latin and out of context quotes from ancient documents.
Finally, STAR-SKAN Algorithm 4: The fundamental notion of habeas corpus. This Latin phrase is translated by STAR-SKAN to mean you already have the person's body, so you might as well keep it—and by the way there is probably not much you will do to it that we will find to be cruel and unusual.
STAR-SKAN will keep a narrow, conservative ideology ascendant no matter who wins future elections, remove judicial appointments from politics and public oversight, and take the unpredictable discretion and independence of judges out of the courts and our system of justice once and for all. Demand that your Congressman vote to install STAR-SKAN now. Or tweet our President and ask him to have the workers at Mar-a-Lago install it before he deports them. We already have drones for some governmental functions and computerized tools for many others. The time is ripe for automating judicial dogmatism as well.
James B. Kobak Jr. is senior ethics counsel in
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFor Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
4 minute readBenjamin West and John Singleton Copley: American Painters in London
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
- 2DOJ Takes on Largest NFT Scheme That Points to Larger Trend
- 3Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 4Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 5Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250