Bonuses Come With Billable Hours Catch at Some Law Firms
Even as they imitate Cravath on bonuses, some firms are adding fine print that shrinks the pot for certain associates and sweetens it for others.
November 29, 2017 at 06:14 PM
21 minute read
As expected, several large law firms have fallen in line with the associate bonus scale set by Cravath, Swaine & Moore this week. But some associates need to work harder to earn their reward than others.
As in past years, some firms are setting billable hour requirements for bonuses this year. Above the Law on Tuesday reported that associates at Norton Rose Fulbright must have 2,300 billable hours to qualify for market rate bonuses set by Cravath—in which most recent law school graduates receive $15,000—while those associates who fall below 2,300 will qualify for bonuses that are half as much as market rate.
When reached for comment, representatives of Norton Rose, which absorbed New York-based Chadbourne & Parke earlier this year, referred to “inaccuracies” in the Above the Law report but did not name specific errors. The firm did not respond when asked whether associates must record 2,300 billable hours to be eligible for the market bonuses.
In a statement, Norton Rose said it did not change its compensation program this year and the firm factors in nonbillable hour work in compensation.
“In addition to hour-based bonuses, our associate compensation program includes a significant discretionary bonus component to encourage and acknowledge important non-billable activities, such as client development and pro bono activities,” the firm said. “We use discretionary bonuses in conjunction with hour-based bonuses to ensure that Norton Rose Fulbright's compensation is in line with, or exceeds, the compensation paid in each of our markets.”
Meanwhile, associates at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft who have recorded at least 2,200 billable hours can earn even more than the scale set by Cravath.
In a firm memo, managing partner Pat Quinn said Cadwalader “had a strong year thanks in no small part to the hard work and dedication of our exceptional legal staff” and outlined in his memo the bonus scale set by Cravath for “qualified associates and special counsel.”
To be qualified, associates must record 2,000 hours. While the firm announced it was jettisoning a billable hours requirement for bonuses in 2014, a firm spokesman said it reinstated a billable hours policy last year. The spokesman said 200 of the 2,000 hours can be from nonbillable hours, such as for pro bono, recruiting and training.
Quinn said in his memo that “qualified associates and special counsel” who have recorded at least 2,200 billable hours “will be awarded bonuses equal to 120 percent of the amounts” in the market scale.
Under this system, qualified first-year associates with at least 2,200 hours may receive a bonus of $18,000, while an eighth-year associate with such billable hours may receive $120,000.
A firm spokesman said Cadwalader implemented the “super-bonus” policy last year, “formalizing something that we and other firms did previously and continue to do” and the firm anticipates healthy participation.
“It appears that a significant number of our associates will be eligible and will receive this 120 percent bonus for billable hours of 2,200 and above,” the spokesman added.
As Cadwalader noted, other firms have offered sweeteners for extra billable work. For instance, in 2012, Kaye Scholer, now a part of Arnold & Porter, told its associates that they would receive extra year-end compensation based on the Cravath scale, with those who rack up at least 2,200 billable hours for the year getting a bonus on top of their bonus.
shutterstockAs expected, several large law firms have fallen in line with the associate bonus scale set by
As in past years, some firms are setting billable hour requirements for bonuses this year. Above the Law on Tuesday reported that associates at
When reached for comment, representatives of
In a statement,
“In addition to hour-based bonuses, our associate compensation program includes a significant discretionary bonus component to encourage and acknowledge important non-billable activities, such as client development and pro bono activities,” the firm said. “We use discretionary bonuses in conjunction with hour-based bonuses to ensure that
Meanwhile, associates at
In a firm memo, managing partner Pat Quinn said Cadwalader “had a strong year thanks in no small part to the hard work and dedication of our exceptional legal staff” and outlined in his memo the bonus scale set by Cravath for “qualified associates and special counsel.”
To be qualified, associates must record 2,000 hours. While the firm announced it was jettisoning a billable hours requirement for bonuses in 2014, a firm spokesman said it reinstated a billable hours policy last year. The spokesman said 200 of the 2,000 hours can be from nonbillable hours, such as for pro bono, recruiting and training.
Quinn said in his memo that “qualified associates and special counsel” who have recorded at least 2,200 billable hours “will be awarded bonuses equal to 120 percent of the amounts” in the market scale.
Under this system, qualified first-year associates with at least 2,200 hours may receive a bonus of $18,000, while an eighth-year associate with such billable hours may receive $120,000.
A firm spokesman said Cadwalader implemented the “super-bonus” policy last year, “formalizing something that we and other firms did previously and continue to do” and the firm anticipates healthy participation.
“It appears that a significant number of our associates will be eligible and will receive this 120 percent bonus for billable hours of 2,200 and above,” the spokesman added.
As Cadwalader noted, other firms have offered sweeteners for extra billable work. For instance, in 2012,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStock Option Exercise Leading to Capital Loss: 'Hann v. United States'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 2Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 3Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 4Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 5Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250