Bonuses Come With Billable Hours Catch at Some Law Firms
Even as they imitate Cravath on bonuses, some firms are adding fine print that shrinks the pot for certain associates and sweetens it for others.
November 29, 2017 at 06:14 PM
21 minute read
shutterstock
As expected, several large law firms have fallen in line with the associate bonus scale set by Cravath, Swaine & Moore this week. But some associates need to work harder to earn their reward than others.
As in past years, some firms are setting billable hour requirements for bonuses this year. Above the Law on Tuesday reported that associates at Norton Rose Fulbright must have 2,300 billable hours to qualify for market rate bonuses set by Cravath—in which most recent law school graduates receive $15,000—while those associates who fall below 2,300 will qualify for bonuses that are half as much as market rate.
When reached for comment, representatives of Norton Rose, which absorbed New York-based Chadbourne & Parke earlier this year, referred to “inaccuracies” in the Above the Law report but did not name specific errors. The firm did not respond when asked whether associates must record 2,300 billable hours to be eligible for the market bonuses.
In a statement, Norton Rose said it did not change its compensation program this year and the firm factors in nonbillable hour work in compensation.
“In addition to hour-based bonuses, our associate compensation program includes a significant discretionary bonus component to encourage and acknowledge important non-billable activities, such as client development and pro bono activities,” the firm said. “We use discretionary bonuses in conjunction with hour-based bonuses to ensure that Norton Rose Fulbright's compensation is in line with, or exceeds, the compensation paid in each of our markets.”
Meanwhile, associates at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft who have recorded at least 2,200 billable hours can earn even more than the scale set by Cravath.
In a firm memo, managing partner Pat Quinn said Cadwalader “had a strong year thanks in no small part to the hard work and dedication of our exceptional legal staff” and outlined in his memo the bonus scale set by Cravath for “qualified associates and special counsel.”
To be qualified, associates must record 2,000 hours. While the firm announced it was jettisoning a billable hours requirement for bonuses in 2014, a firm spokesman said it reinstated a billable hours policy last year. The spokesman said 200 of the 2,000 hours can be from nonbillable hours, such as for pro bono, recruiting and training.
Quinn said in his memo that “qualified associates and special counsel” who have recorded at least 2,200 billable hours “will be awarded bonuses equal to 120 percent of the amounts” in the market scale.
Under this system, qualified first-year associates with at least 2,200 hours may receive a bonus of $18,000, while an eighth-year associate with such billable hours may receive $120,000.
A firm spokesman said Cadwalader implemented the “super-bonus” policy last year, “formalizing something that we and other firms did previously and continue to do” and the firm anticipates healthy participation.
“It appears that a significant number of our associates will be eligible and will receive this 120 percent bonus for billable hours of 2,200 and above,” the spokesman added.
As Cadwalader noted, other firms have offered sweeteners for extra billable work. For instance, in 2012, Kaye Scholer, now a part of Arnold & Porter, told its associates that they would receive extra year-end compensation based on the Cravath scale, with those who rack up at least 2,200 billable hours for the year getting a bonus on top of their bonus.
shutterstock
As expected, several large law firms have fallen in line with the associate bonus scale set by
As in past years, some firms are setting billable hour requirements for bonuses this year. Above the Law on Tuesday reported that associates at
When reached for comment, representatives of
In a statement,
“In addition to hour-based bonuses, our associate compensation program includes a significant discretionary bonus component to encourage and acknowledge important non-billable activities, such as client development and pro bono activities,” the firm said. “We use discretionary bonuses in conjunction with hour-based bonuses to ensure that
Meanwhile, associates at
In a firm memo, managing partner Pat Quinn said Cadwalader “had a strong year thanks in no small part to the hard work and dedication of our exceptional legal staff” and outlined in his memo the bonus scale set by Cravath for “qualified associates and special counsel.”
To be qualified, associates must record 2,000 hours. While the firm announced it was jettisoning a billable hours requirement for bonuses in 2014, a firm spokesman said it reinstated a billable hours policy last year. The spokesman said 200 of the 2,000 hours can be from nonbillable hours, such as for pro bono, recruiting and training.
Quinn said in his memo that “qualified associates and special counsel” who have recorded at least 2,200 billable hours “will be awarded bonuses equal to 120 percent of the amounts” in the market scale.
Under this system, qualified first-year associates with at least 2,200 hours may receive a bonus of $18,000, while an eighth-year associate with such billable hours may receive $120,000.
A firm spokesman said Cadwalader implemented the “super-bonus” policy last year, “formalizing something that we and other firms did previously and continue to do” and the firm anticipates healthy participation.
“It appears that a significant number of our associates will be eligible and will receive this 120 percent bonus for billable hours of 2,200 and above,” the spokesman added.
As Cadwalader noted, other firms have offered sweeteners for extra billable work. For instance, in 2012,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStock Option Exercise Leading to Capital Loss: 'Hann v. United States'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250