NY Judiciary Seeks $44.4M Budget Increase
The state's unified court system is asking the governor and Legislature for a budget increase of $44.4 million for the judiciary for the upcoming fiscal year, according to the budgetary request released Friday.
December 01, 2017 at 02:14 PM
7 minute read
The state's unified court system is asking the governor and Legislature for a budget increase of $44.4 million for the judiciary for the upcoming fiscal year, according to the budgetary request released Friday.
The budget request totals $2.23 billion for the upcoming fiscal year and stays within the 2 percent spending growth Gov. Andrew Cuomo has asked state agencies to abide by. The budget request also includes an $18 million capital appropriation to be used for technology, security and records request managements in an effort to advance Chief Judge Janet DiFiore's Excellence Initiative, which seeks to reduce chronic backlogs in the court system and reduce the time it takes to dispose of cases.
The 2 percent budget increase request will allow for “adequate court staffing, especially in clerk, court officer, interpreter, court reporter, and other courtroom and back office positions that are critical to providing a high level of service to the public,” the budgetary request to Cuomo and members of the Legislature says. The increase request will also allow the judiciary to “incrementally restore” a number of programs that were cut due to budget constraints in previous years.
“For example, we will be able to provide increased funding for such programs as the Community Dispute Resolution Centers, which recruit, train and supervise volunteers who provide free and low-cost mediation and other alternative dispute resolution services in civil, criminal and Family Court matters for parties who are unable to afford these services. We will also be able to increase funding for the Court Appointed Special Advocate program,” the 188-page budgetary request says.
The judiciary's requested budget also seeks a $500,000 funding increase in the Justice Court Assistance Program to help mitigate the costs associated with off-hours arraignments.
Most of the judiciary's $18 million capital request will go toward modernizing the judiciary's computer network and providing computer equipment for judges, court staff and court system's data centers. Of the $18 million, $3 million would go toward modernizing security equipment, including X-ray machines and security cameras and another $2 million of the requested amount would go toward digitalization of records.
At an Assembly hearing held Friday in Manhattan to discuss the 2017-2018 fiscal year judiciary budget, Assembly Judiciary Chair Jeff Dinowitz asked how the judiciary has fared with relatively flat budgets over several years.
Michelle Smith, the chief of staff to Deputy Chief Administrative Judge for Justice Initiatives Edwina Mendelson—who is out of the country—did not have an immediate answer to Dinowitz's question. Another hearing on the judiciary's budget is expected early next year when the lawmakers come back to Albany for the legislative session.
Dinowitz, a Bronx Democrat who was recently appointed as the head of the judiciary committee, remarked on the “enormous need” for additional Supreme Court justices in areas of the state experiencing “enormous” backlogs.
“We know that there are many people who languish in jail for ridiculous amounts of time,” Dinowitz said. “It seems to me … one of the problems is that we need more judges.”
Assemblyman David Buchwald, a Democrat from Westchester, asked Anne Erickson, the president and CEO of the Empire Justice Center, how the state should prioritize the expansion of civil legal services.
“One of the things we need to really start thinking about is how are we funding the delivery system [of civil legal services]. Right now with the judiciary legal services we are really funding the one-on-one representation,” Erickson said. “But to really fund a delivery system, we really have to be looking at funding things like the training, the support, the technical assistance, the coming together of attorneys working on similar issues.”
Budget negotiations between the Senate, Assembly and governor's office begin in earnest in March, with a financial plan due by April 1.
The state's unified court system is asking the governor and Legislature for a budget increase of $44.4 million for the judiciary for the upcoming fiscal year, according to the budgetary request released Friday.
The budget request totals $2.23 billion for the upcoming fiscal year and stays within the 2 percent spending growth Gov. Andrew Cuomo has asked state agencies to abide by. The budget request also includes an $18 million capital appropriation to be used for technology, security and records request managements in an effort to advance Chief Judge Janet DiFiore's Excellence Initiative, which seeks to reduce chronic backlogs in the court system and reduce the time it takes to dispose of cases.
The 2 percent budget increase request will allow for “adequate court staffing, especially in clerk, court officer, interpreter, court reporter, and other courtroom and back office positions that are critical to providing a high level of service to the public,” the budgetary request to Cuomo and members of the Legislature says. The increase request will also allow the judiciary to “incrementally restore” a number of programs that were cut due to budget constraints in previous years.
“For example, we will be able to provide increased funding for such programs as the Community Dispute Resolution Centers, which recruit, train and supervise volunteers who provide free and low-cost mediation and other alternative dispute resolution services in civil, criminal and Family Court matters for parties who are unable to afford these services. We will also be able to increase funding for the Court Appointed Special Advocate program,” the 188-page budgetary request says.
The judiciary's requested budget also seeks a $500,000 funding increase in the Justice Court Assistance Program to help mitigate the costs associated with off-hours arraignments.
Most of the judiciary's $18 million capital request will go toward modernizing the judiciary's computer network and providing computer equipment for judges, court staff and court system's data centers. Of the $18 million, $3 million would go toward modernizing security equipment, including X-ray machines and security cameras and another $2 million of the requested amount would go toward digitalization of records.
At an Assembly hearing held Friday in Manhattan to discuss the 2017-2018 fiscal year judiciary budget, Assembly Judiciary Chair Jeff Dinowitz asked how the judiciary has fared with relatively flat budgets over several years.
Michelle Smith, the chief of staff to Deputy Chief Administrative Judge for Justice Initiatives Edwina Mendelson—who is out of the country—did not have an immediate answer to Dinowitz's question. Another hearing on the judiciary's budget is expected early next year when the lawmakers come back to Albany for the legislative session.
Dinowitz, a Bronx Democrat who was recently appointed as the head of the judiciary committee, remarked on the “enormous need” for additional Supreme Court justices in areas of the state experiencing “enormous” backlogs.
“We know that there are many people who languish in jail for ridiculous amounts of time,” Dinowitz said. “It seems to me … one of the problems is that we need more judges.”
Assemblyman David Buchwald, a Democrat from Westchester, asked Anne Erickson, the president and CEO of the Empire Justice Center, how the state should prioritize the expansion of civil legal services.
“One of the things we need to really start thinking about is how are we funding the delivery system [of civil legal services]. Right now with the judiciary legal services we are really funding the one-on-one representation,” Erickson said. “But to really fund a delivery system, we really have to be looking at funding things like the training, the support, the technical assistance, the coming together of attorneys working on similar issues.”
Budget negotiations between the Senate, Assembly and governor's office begin in earnest in March, with a financial plan due by April 1.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250