Proposed NYC Online Bail Pay System Sees Further Delays
Citing technological issues, New York City officials say the planned release of an online system to pay bail will be postponed until at least April 2018, a year later than originally planned.
December 05, 2017 at 03:40 PM
11 minute read
Citing technological issues, New York City officials say the planned release of an online system to pay bail will be postponed until at least April 2018, a year later than originally planned.
Elizabeth Glazer, director of the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice, told a New York City Council committee during a hearing Monday—included in an update on efforts to reduce the prisoner population on Rikers Island and eventually closing the sprawling facility—that implementing the system for paying bail online required modernization of computer systems within the Department of Correction.
“It was like opening the hood of a car and finding everything else needs to be fixed,” Glazer said to members of the council's Committee on Fire and Criminal Justice Services.
Councilman Rory Lancman, D-Queens, who serves on the Fire and Criminal Justice Committee, issued a statement following the hearing blasting the timeline for implementing the online bail pay system.
“Too many New Yorkers are stuck on Rikers Island solely because the process to pay bail is such a nightmare,” Lancman said. “The city's inability to bring the bail payment process into the 21st century is only adding to the problem of unnecessary and expensive incarceration.”
Patrick Gallahue, a spokesman for the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice, said in an email that setting up the new system required updating an “antiquated system that suffered through lengthy periods of underinvestment by prior administrations.”
Gallahue also said that there were delays in selecting a contractor to establish the new system because the city received more bids than expected. As part of the system, the city plans to establish kiosks in each of the five boroughs to allow people who do not have internet access at home to make bail payments.
For the past several years, many elected leaders in New York City have made calls to limit or completely eliminate the use of cash bail, arguing that it effectively criminalizes poverty.
The new system was first announced in November 2016 and was expected to be operational by this past spring.
Defendants are not allowed to bring their wallets to arraignments and must rely on friends or family members to be present with cash on hand if they want to avoid being put in jail.
Otherwise, bail money must be paid in-person at Rikers or at detention centers in the Bronx, Brooklyn and Manhattan.
About one in 10 defendants are able to pay on time to avoid a jail stay, according to a landmark report by the Independent Commission on New York City Criminal Justice and Incarceration Reform.
On any given day, the commission's report stated, about 75 percent of the 9,700 prisoners in city jail facilities are being held there because they cannot afford bail.
The commission, chaired by former Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, who is now of counsel to Latham & Watkins, recommended the gradual closure of the 10 jail facilities on Rikers and instead housing the city's prisoners in borough-based facilities.
Mayor Bill de Blasio and members of the city council have put their support behind the proposal to close Rikers.
In June, the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice released its own roadmap to reduce the city's jail population that contains proposals for measure to reduce the population by 25 percent over five years, to 7,000.
“While 'Close Rikers' has become a convenient moniker, it masks the seismic system change that must happen to achieve that one goal,” Glazer said at the Fire and Criminal Justice Committee meeting on Monday.
But Lippman, who also testified at the hearing, said the city should act with more urgency to reduce the population, such as by expanding supervised release programs, and noted that his commission has called for lowering it to 5,000 and that there is broad-based political support for taking prisoners off of Rikers.
“If we're not going to break bones, if we're not going to do strong things, if we're not going to have political courage, we could lose all of [it] and it becomes another one of those things that goes on and on while we talk and talk and talk,” Lippman said.
Skyward Kick Productions/Shutterstock.com.Citing technological issues,
Elizabeth Glazer, director of the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice, told a
“It was like opening the hood of a car and finding everything else needs to be fixed,” Glazer said to members of the council's Committee on Fire and Criminal Justice Services.
Councilman Rory Lancman, D-Queens, who serves on the Fire and Criminal Justice Committee, issued a statement following the hearing blasting the timeline for implementing the online bail pay system.
“Too many New Yorkers are stuck on Rikers Island solely because the process to pay bail is such a nightmare,” Lancman said. “The city's inability to bring the bail payment process into the 21st century is only adding to the problem of unnecessary and expensive incarceration.”
Patrick Gallahue, a spokesman for the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice, said in an email that setting up the new system required updating an “antiquated system that suffered through lengthy periods of underinvestment by prior administrations.”
Gallahue also said that there were delays in selecting a contractor to establish the new system because the city received more bids than expected. As part of the system, the city plans to establish kiosks in each of the five boroughs to allow people who do not have internet access at home to make bail payments.
For the past several years, many elected leaders in
The new system was first announced in November 2016 and was expected to be operational by this past spring.
Defendants are not allowed to bring their wallets to arraignments and must rely on friends or family members to be present with cash on hand if they want to avoid being put in jail.
Otherwise, bail money must be paid in-person at Rikers or at detention centers in the Bronx, Brooklyn and Manhattan.
About one in 10 defendants are able to pay on time to avoid a jail stay, according to a landmark report by the Independent Commission on
On any given day, the commission's report stated, about 75 percent of the 9,700 prisoners in city jail facilities are being held there because they cannot afford bail.
The commission, chaired by former Chief Judge
Mayor Bill de Blasio and members of the city council have put their support behind the proposal to close Rikers.
In June, the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice released its own roadmap to reduce the city's jail population that contains proposals for measure to reduce the population by 25 percent over five years, to 7,000.
“While 'Close Rikers' has become a convenient moniker, it masks the seismic system change that must happen to achieve that one goal,” Glazer said at the Fire and Criminal Justice Committee meeting on Monday.
But Lippman, who also testified at the hearing, said the city should act with more urgency to reduce the population, such as by expanding supervised release programs, and noted that his commission has called for lowering it to 5,000 and that there is broad-based political support for taking prisoners off of Rikers.
“If we're not going to break bones, if we're not going to do strong things, if we're not going to have political courage, we could lose all of [it] and it becomes another one of those things that goes on and on while we talk and talk and talk,” Lippman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
Distressed M&A: Safe Harbor Protection Extends to Overarching Transfer
Trending Stories
- 1Midsize Firm Bressler Amery Absorbs Austin Boutique, Gaining Four Lawyers
- 2Bill Would Allow Californians to Sue Big Oil for Climate-Linked Wildfires, Floods
- 3LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
- 4Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Lawsuit Over FBI Raid at Wrong House
- 5What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250