Proposed NYC Online Bail Pay System Sees Further Delays
Citing technological issues, New York City officials say the planned release of an online system to pay bail will be postponed until at least April 2018, a year later than originally planned.
December 05, 2017 at 03:40 PM
11 minute read
Skyward Kick Productions/Shutterstock.com.
Citing technological issues, New York City officials say the planned release of an online system to pay bail will be postponed until at least April 2018, a year later than originally planned.
Elizabeth Glazer, director of the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice, told a New York City Council committee during a hearing Monday—included in an update on efforts to reduce the prisoner population on Rikers Island and eventually closing the sprawling facility—that implementing the system for paying bail online required modernization of computer systems within the Department of Correction.
“It was like opening the hood of a car and finding everything else needs to be fixed,” Glazer said to members of the council's Committee on Fire and Criminal Justice Services.
Councilman Rory Lancman, D-Queens, who serves on the Fire and Criminal Justice Committee, issued a statement following the hearing blasting the timeline for implementing the online bail pay system.
“Too many New Yorkers are stuck on Rikers Island solely because the process to pay bail is such a nightmare,” Lancman said. “The city's inability to bring the bail payment process into the 21st century is only adding to the problem of unnecessary and expensive incarceration.”
Patrick Gallahue, a spokesman for the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice, said in an email that setting up the new system required updating an “antiquated system that suffered through lengthy periods of underinvestment by prior administrations.”
Gallahue also said that there were delays in selecting a contractor to establish the new system because the city received more bids than expected. As part of the system, the city plans to establish kiosks in each of the five boroughs to allow people who do not have internet access at home to make bail payments.
For the past several years, many elected leaders in New York City have made calls to limit or completely eliminate the use of cash bail, arguing that it effectively criminalizes poverty.
The new system was first announced in November 2016 and was expected to be operational by this past spring.
Defendants are not allowed to bring their wallets to arraignments and must rely on friends or family members to be present with cash on hand if they want to avoid being put in jail.
Otherwise, bail money must be paid in-person at Rikers or at detention centers in the Bronx, Brooklyn and Manhattan.
About one in 10 defendants are able to pay on time to avoid a jail stay, according to a landmark report by the Independent Commission on New York City Criminal Justice and Incarceration Reform.
On any given day, the commission's report stated, about 75 percent of the 9,700 prisoners in city jail facilities are being held there because they cannot afford bail.
The commission, chaired by former Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, who is now of counsel to Latham & Watkins, recommended the gradual closure of the 10 jail facilities on Rikers and instead housing the city's prisoners in borough-based facilities.
Mayor Bill de Blasio and members of the city council have put their support behind the proposal to close Rikers.
In June, the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice released its own roadmap to reduce the city's jail population that contains proposals for measure to reduce the population by 25 percent over five years, to 7,000.
“While 'Close Rikers' has become a convenient moniker, it masks the seismic system change that must happen to achieve that one goal,” Glazer said at the Fire and Criminal Justice Committee meeting on Monday.
But Lippman, who also testified at the hearing, said the city should act with more urgency to reduce the population, such as by expanding supervised release programs, and noted that his commission has called for lowering it to 5,000 and that there is broad-based political support for taking prisoners off of Rikers.
“If we're not going to break bones, if we're not going to do strong things, if we're not going to have political courage, we could lose all of [it] and it becomes another one of those things that goes on and on while we talk and talk and talk,” Lippman said.
Skyward Kick Productions/Shutterstock.com.
Citing technological issues,
Elizabeth Glazer, director of the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice, told a
“It was like opening the hood of a car and finding everything else needs to be fixed,” Glazer said to members of the council's Committee on Fire and Criminal Justice Services.
Councilman Rory Lancman, D-Queens, who serves on the Fire and Criminal Justice Committee, issued a statement following the hearing blasting the timeline for implementing the online bail pay system.
“Too many New Yorkers are stuck on Rikers Island solely because the process to pay bail is such a nightmare,” Lancman said. “The city's inability to bring the bail payment process into the 21st century is only adding to the problem of unnecessary and expensive incarceration.”
Patrick Gallahue, a spokesman for the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice, said in an email that setting up the new system required updating an “antiquated system that suffered through lengthy periods of underinvestment by prior administrations.”
Gallahue also said that there were delays in selecting a contractor to establish the new system because the city received more bids than expected. As part of the system, the city plans to establish kiosks in each of the five boroughs to allow people who do not have internet access at home to make bail payments.
For the past several years, many elected leaders in
The new system was first announced in November 2016 and was expected to be operational by this past spring.
Defendants are not allowed to bring their wallets to arraignments and must rely on friends or family members to be present with cash on hand if they want to avoid being put in jail.
Otherwise, bail money must be paid in-person at Rikers or at detention centers in the Bronx, Brooklyn and Manhattan.
About one in 10 defendants are able to pay on time to avoid a jail stay, according to a landmark report by the Independent Commission on
On any given day, the commission's report stated, about 75 percent of the 9,700 prisoners in city jail facilities are being held there because they cannot afford bail.
The commission, chaired by former Chief Judge
Mayor Bill de Blasio and members of the city council have put their support behind the proposal to close Rikers.
In June, the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice released its own roadmap to reduce the city's jail population that contains proposals for measure to reduce the population by 25 percent over five years, to 7,000.
“While 'Close Rikers' has become a convenient moniker, it masks the seismic system change that must happen to achieve that one goal,” Glazer said at the Fire and Criminal Justice Committee meeting on Monday.
But Lippman, who also testified at the hearing, said the city should act with more urgency to reduce the population, such as by expanding supervised release programs, and noted that his commission has called for lowering it to 5,000 and that there is broad-based political support for taking prisoners off of Rikers.
“If we're not going to break bones, if we're not going to do strong things, if we're not going to have political courage, we could lose all of [it] and it becomes another one of those things that goes on and on while we talk and talk and talk,” Lippman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Partner Presented With State Bar's Scheindlin Award
'A World of Credit': Ex-FTX Executive Gary Wang Sentenced to Time Served Following Cooperation
Manhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
Trending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250