A Sensible Step That Is Long Overdue
The 15 schools as of this writing that already have started to use the GREs to evaluate applicants, and the inevitable large number of law schools that soon no doubt will join them, are taking a sensible step that is long overdue.
December 07, 2017 at 02:30 PM
6 minute read
The timely article by Angela Morris, “Can the GRE Cure What Ails Law Schools?” (New York Law Journal, Dec. 1, 2017), highlights a development that is part of a much larger trend in legal education. Law schools everywhere are thoughtfully examining every aspect of legal education from snout to tail and, where warranted, are considering prudent changes to assure that their students will succeed in a rapidly changing marketplace for new lawyers.
Like most fields, law and policymaking have been forever altered by advances in technology, economic change, and the increasingly global nature of law, which have significantly broadened the universe of skills and backgrounds necessary for the legal services industry to be truly responsive to society's changing needs. The way in which we attract and comprehensively evaluate our prospective law students must change as well. The GRE provides another objective measure that is widely used in graduate education by which we can assess an applicant's potential to succeed in both law school and professionally.
The 15 schools as of this writing—now including Brooklyn Law School—that already have started to use the GREs to evaluate applicants, and the inevitable large number of law schools that soon no doubt will join them, are taking a sensible step that is long overdue.
Accepting the GRE for admission encourages talented, highly able students from diverse backgrounds—including those in the sciences, technology, engineering, and medicine—who have not taken LSATs but are interested in pursuing a law degree to consider applying to law school.
Accepting the GRE also provides flexibility—as well as potential time and cost savings—for those for whom preparation for multiple advanced studies admissions exams is not feasible. Further, the GRE is administered more frequently and more widely, making this part of the admissions process more accessible to potential applicants.
One aspect of Morris' article must be refuted: The assertion by Kellye Testy, President and CEO of the Law School Admission Council (LSAC), which administers the LSAT, that schools have been motivated to accept GREs to game the US News system is simply wrong. US News ranks many other types of graduate and undergraduate schools that have more than one type of entrance exam, and they will use a similar formula to account for law schools that accept both LSATs and GREs for admission. This is what Robert Morse, who runs the US News rankings, told us two years ago during a face-to-face meeting in his Washington, D.C. office when the subject of GREs arose.
Use of the GRE by law schools may well give the LSAT monopoly some competition, but competition and choice are good things. Then it is the responsibility of each law school to establish appropriate criteria for admitting candidates based on GREs in a measured, thoughtful way.
Nicholas W. Allard is president and dean of Brooklyn Law School.
Nicholas AllardThe timely article by Angela Morris, “Can the GRE Cure What Ails Law Schools?” (
Like most fields, law and policymaking have been forever altered by advances in technology, economic change, and the increasingly global nature of law, which have significantly broadened the universe of skills and backgrounds necessary for the legal services industry to be truly responsive to society's changing needs. The way in which we attract and comprehensively evaluate our prospective law students must change as well. The GRE provides another objective measure that is widely used in graduate education by which we can assess an applicant's potential to succeed in both law school and professionally.
The 15 schools as of this writing—now including
Accepting the GRE for admission encourages talented, highly able students from diverse backgrounds—including those in the sciences, technology, engineering, and medicine—who have not taken LSATs but are interested in pursuing a law degree to consider applying to law school.
Accepting the GRE also provides flexibility—as well as potential time and cost savings—for those for whom preparation for multiple advanced studies admissions exams is not feasible. Further, the GRE is administered more frequently and more widely, making this part of the admissions process more accessible to potential applicants.
One aspect of Morris' article must be refuted: The assertion by Kellye Testy, President and CEO of the Law School Admission Council (LSAC), which administers the LSAT, that schools have been motivated to accept GREs to game the US News system is simply wrong. US News ranks many other types of graduate and undergraduate schools that have more than one type of entrance exam, and they will use a similar formula to account for law schools that accept both LSATs and GREs for admission. This is what Robert Morse, who runs the US News rankings, told us two years ago during a face-to-face meeting in his Washington, D.C. office when the subject of GREs arose.
Use of the GRE by law schools may well give the LSAT monopoly some competition, but competition and choice are good things. Then it is the responsibility of each law school to establish appropriate criteria for admitting candidates based on GREs in a measured, thoughtful way.
Nicholas W. Allard is president and dean of
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York's Court System Says More Work Is Needed To Clear Up Case Delays
13 minute readNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for law firm Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250