Federal Immigration Enforcement: Court Arrests Are 'Safer'
A spokeswoman for ICE said Friday that the agents pursue arrests of undocumented immigrants in courthouses because the facilities provide a “far safer” environment for everyone involved, responding to calls by legal advocacy groups for state courts to impose limits on the practice.
December 08, 2017 at 02:35 PM
8 minute read
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in Washington, D.C. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Responding to mounting criticism by legal assistance and advocacy groups about courthouse arrests by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, a spokeswoman for ICE said Friday that the federal agents pursue arrests of undocumented immigrants in courthouses because the facilities provide a “far safer” environment.
“Because sanctuary cities like New York City do not honor ICE detainers, aliens, who often have significant criminal histories, are released onto the street, presenting a potential public safety threat. Courthouse visitors are typically screened upon entry, making arrests inside such facilities far safer for everyone involved,” ICE spokeswoman Rachael Yong Yow said in an email to the New York Law Journal.
A coalition of legal groups has asked that the state Office of Court Administration and Chief Judge Janet DiFiore issue rules to curb ICE arrests at courthouses.
Expanded immigration enforcement actions under the Trump administration have resulted in more arrests at courts nationally since the beginning of 2017, according to a report by the Fund for Modern Courts. So far this year, ICE agents have arrested 52 people while they were in court in New York state, the majority in New York City, a spokesman for the OCA told the New York Law Journal earlier this week. Since this is the first year OCA has tracked ICE activities and arrests in courts, it's difficult to compare this year's arrests to previous years.
The ICE spokeswoman said that the agency has “always conducted courthouses arrests on an as-needed basis.” Data on how many ICE arrests in courts have occurred over the last several years was not immediately available.
The Legal Aid Society, New York County Defender Services, Brooklyn Defender Services, The Bronx Defenders and Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem held a rally in Brooklyn on Thursday arguing that immigration enforcement at courthouses “deters those seeking redress from the courts.”
Undocumented individuals who are victims of a crime or witnesses are not a “target” for ICE agents, Yong Yow said. While ICE does arrest undocumented individuals at the courts, it's only after investigative officers have exhausted other options, the federal agency under the jurisdiction of the Department of Homeland Security said.
In response to ICE's remarks to the New York Law Journal, The Legal Aid Society contends that courthouse arrests discourage witnesses.
“Let's be clear: ICE's continued presence at courthouses jeopardizes everyone's safety and security, discourages clients and witnesses from appearing in court, and that undermines public safety and the reliability of the court system,” said Legal Aid spokesman Redmond Haskins. “These arrests discredit the integrity of our entire judicial system and erode basic tenets of due process and fair proceedings. Despite the tone-deaf response from ICE, this is the daunting reality that's currently playing out across New York state and the rest of the country.”
Earlier this week, the Fund for Modern Courts issued a report suggesting that the state's courts should limit their cooperation and assistance with immigration enforcement officers in state court buildings. The report by the justice system reform group asked that OCA reduce the frequency in which undocumented individuals need to appear in court, instead having them call in or video conference.
The OCA, which has had a “continuing dialogue” with federal and local officials regarding ICE agents making arrests in courthouses, has requested that that immigration enforcement officials treat courthouses as “sensitive locations,” which include schools, hospitals and places of worship where ICE enforcement actions are not to occur unless “exigent circumstances exists.”
Yong Yow said ICE does not consider courthouses to be sensitive locations.
“The agency complies fully with all prevailing jurisdictional court policies and makes efforts to exhaust all other avenues before effecting a courthouse arrest,” she said in an email.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in Washington, D.C. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Responding to mounting criticism by legal assistance and advocacy groups about courthouse arrests by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, a spokeswoman for ICE said Friday that the federal agents pursue arrests of undocumented immigrants in courthouses because the facilities provide a “far safer” environment.
“Because sanctuary cities like
A coalition of legal groups has asked that the state Office of Court Administration and Chief Judge Janet DiFiore issue rules to curb ICE arrests at courthouses.
Expanded immigration enforcement actions under the Trump administration have resulted in more arrests at courts nationally since the beginning of 2017, according to a report by the Fund for Modern Courts. So far this year, ICE agents have arrested 52 people while they were in court in
The ICE spokeswoman said that the agency has “always conducted courthouses arrests on an as-needed basis.” Data on how many ICE arrests in courts have occurred over the last several years was not immediately available.
The Legal Aid Society,
Undocumented individuals who are victims of a crime or witnesses are not a “target” for ICE agents, Yong Yow said. While ICE does arrest undocumented individuals at the courts, it's only after investigative officers have exhausted other options, the federal agency under the jurisdiction of the Department of Homeland Security said.
In response to ICE's remarks to the
“Let's be clear: ICE's continued presence at courthouses jeopardizes everyone's safety and security, discourages clients and witnesses from appearing in court, and that undermines public safety and the reliability of the court system,” said Legal Aid spokesman Redmond Haskins. “These arrests discredit the integrity of our entire judicial system and erode basic tenets of due process and fair proceedings. Despite the tone-deaf response from ICE, this is the daunting reality that's currently playing out across
Earlier this week, the Fund for Modern Courts issued a report suggesting that the state's courts should limit their cooperation and assistance with immigration enforcement officers in state court buildings. The report by the justice system reform group asked that OCA reduce the frequency in which undocumented individuals need to appear in court, instead having them call in or video conference.
The OCA, which has had a “continuing dialogue” with federal and local officials regarding ICE agents making arrests in courthouses, has requested that that immigration enforcement officials treat courthouses as “sensitive locations,” which include schools, hospitals and places of worship where ICE enforcement actions are not to occur unless “exigent circumstances exists.”
Yong Yow said ICE does not consider courthouses to be sensitive locations.
“The agency complies fully with all prevailing jurisdictional court policies and makes efforts to exhaust all other avenues before effecting a courthouse arrest,” she said in an email.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ Supports Appointing US Judge Backed By Trump to Review Mar-a-Lago Documents
3 minute readJay-Z, Quinn Emanuel Say AAA Offers Only 'Token' Black Arbitrators
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250